Talk:33/25: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older editNewer edit →
VisualWikitext
Xenwolf (talk | contribs)
autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, confirmaccount-notify, Interface administrators, Sysops
8,705 edits
re + heading (topic)
Aura (talk | contribs)
autopatrolled, emailconfirmed
6,010 edits
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:


: You mean both ([[33/25]] and [[128/99]]) are undecimal fourths? But the other is much more a subfourth ... --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 21:17, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
: You mean both ([[33/25]] and [[128/99]]) are undecimal fourths? But the other is much more a subfourth ... --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 21:17, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
:: It is indeed the case that [[128/99]] is more of a subfourth.  However, if you look in the infobox for [[33/25]], you will see that 33/25 is dubbed the "undecimal sub-fourth".  Therefore, the name in the infobox for 33/25 ought to be changed. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 21:24, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:24, 17 December 2020

128/99

Okay, we need to work out how to distinguish this interval from 128/99 in terms of nomenclature. --Aura (talk) 21:02, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

You mean both (33/25 and 128/99) are undecimal fourths? But the other is much more a subfourth ... --Xenwolf (talk) 21:17, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
It is indeed the case that 128/99 is more of a subfourth. However, if you look in the infobox for 33/25, you will see that 33/25 is dubbed the "undecimal sub-fourth". Therefore, the name in the infobox for 33/25 ought to be changed. --Aura (talk) 21:24, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=Talk:33/25&oldid=56866"