User:FloraC/Temperament extension issues: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
: 11-limit alphatrident should be decanonicalized. The tuning is not very representative of 7-limit alphatrident. Specifically, alphatrident has three 11-limit extensions: 176 & 229, 229 & 282, and 282 & 335d. The first and last are supported by 53 which means they are simpler, but they are not representative of the 7-limit optimum. The middle one is representative of the 7-limit optimum, but is very complex. Therefore, the situation is similar to slendric, where none of the extensions should be canon. | : 11-limit alphatrident should be decanonicalized. The tuning is not very representative of 7-limit alphatrident. Specifically, alphatrident has three 11-limit extensions: 176 & 229, 229 & 282, and 282 & 335d. The first and last are supported by 53 which means they are simpler, but they are not representative of the 7-limit optimum. The middle one is representative of the 7-limit optimum, but is very complex. Therefore, the situation is similar to slendric, where none of the extensions should be canon. | ||
: Proposed solution: | : Proposed solution: | ||
; Diminished | ; Diminished | ||
: 7-limit → 11-limit | : 7-limit → 11-limit | ||
: 11-limit diminished should be decanonicalized. It flips the optimal tuning from flat to sharp of just. | : 11-limit diminished should be decanonicalized. It flips the optimal tuning from flat to sharp of just. | ||
: Proposed solution: | |||
; Hemiwürschmidt | |||
: 7-limit → 11-limit | |||
: 11-limit hemiwürschmidt should be decanonicalized. The 7-limit optimum is between 99 and 130. The 11-limit extension shifts it to somewhere between 130 and 161, and is a significant drop in accuracy. Hemiwürschmidt is also described as a 2.3.5.7.23-subgroup temperament, which is more natural. | |||
: Proposed solution: | : Proposed solution: | ||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
: 7-limit → 11-limit | : 7-limit → 11-limit | ||
: 11-limit tertiaseptal should be decanonicalized. Tertiaseptal has three 11-limit extensions: 109 & 140, 140 & 171, and 171 & 202. Perhaps, the canonicity of 171 & 202 could be argued on the basis that the 7-limit optimum is very close to 171; however, compared to the absolute supremacy of the 7-limit temperament, this 11-limit extension is plain bad. ''Tertia'' and ''tertiaseptia'' are bad-tasted names so we might wanna reconsider these names too. | : 11-limit tertiaseptal should be decanonicalized. Tertiaseptal has three 11-limit extensions: 109 & 140, 140 & 171, and 171 & 202. Perhaps, the canonicity of 171 & 202 could be argued on the basis that the 7-limit optimum is very close to 171; however, compared to the absolute supremacy of the 7-limit temperament, this 11-limit extension is plain bad. ''Tertia'' and ''tertiaseptia'' are bad-tasted names so we might wanna reconsider these names too. | ||
: Proposed solution: | |||
; Würschmidt | |||
: 5-limit → 7-limit | |||
: 7-limit würschmidt should be decanonicalized. Almost all the notable supporting equal temperaments are dual-7: 34, 65, 96, and 127, and that speaks something about it. Würschmidt is also described as a 2.3.5.23-subgroup temperament, which is more natural. | |||
: Proposed solution: | : Proposed solution: | ||
| Line 75: | Line 80: | ||
: 7-limit augene should be canonicalized while 13-limit augene should be decanonicalized. Tempering out 126/125 is natural for diaschismic, augmented and diminished, and since both diaschismic and diminished have canonical 7-limit extensions, so should augmented (even tho septimal diaschismic is essentially grandfathered in). Furthermore, the 11-limit extension should remain as canon, for the 11-odd-limit diamond monotone range is the same as 9-odd-limit. The name ''augene'' may remain as an alias for this temperament, but the 13-limit extension should eventually have its name changed cuz that one is much worse. | : 7-limit augene should be canonicalized while 13-limit augene should be decanonicalized. Tempering out 126/125 is natural for diaschismic, augmented and diminished, and since both diaschismic and diminished have canonical 7-limit extensions, so should augmented (even tho septimal diaschismic is essentially grandfathered in). Furthermore, the 11-limit extension should remain as canon, for the 11-odd-limit diamond monotone range is the same as 9-odd-limit. The name ''augene'' may remain as an alias for this temperament, but the 13-limit extension should eventually have its name changed cuz that one is much worse. | ||
: Proposed solution: 7-, 11-, and 13-limit augene → augmented (augene). Status: changed. | : Proposed solution: 7-, 11-, and 13-limit augene → augmented (augene). Status: changed. | ||
; Dicot | |||
: 5-limit → 7-limit | |||
: 7-limit dicot should be decanonicalized. It has been clear that it's difficult to discuss these as a single temperament. The 7-limit extension is in fact the best extension of 2.3.7-subgroup {54/49} (in the same way beep is the best extension of bug), known as ''mujannabic'', so it may inherit that name. | |||
: Proposed solution: 7- and 11-limit dicot → mujannabic. Status: changed. | |||
; Ennealimmal | ; Ennealimmal | ||