User:Arseniiv/Three-gap theorem: Difference between revisions

Arseniiv (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Arseniiv (talk | contribs)
m missed italic
 
Line 23: Line 23:
A bit less trivial is that "projecting" an element onto last row and column splits it (modulo 1): <math>\{ I_{m,N} + I_{N,n} \} = \{ (N - m + n - N) g \} = \{ (n - m) g \} = I_{m,n}</math>. The sum <math>I_{m,N} + I_{N,n}</math> is always 0 or 1 larger than <math>I_{m,n}</math>, in the former case really splitting the interval.
A bit less trivial is that "projecting" an element onto last row and column splits it (modulo 1): <math>\{ I_{m,N} + I_{N,n} \} = \{ (N - m + n - N) g \} = \{ (n - m) g \} = I_{m,n}</math>. The sum <math>I_{m,N} + I_{N,n}</math> is always 0 or 1 larger than <math>I_{m,n}</math>, in the former case really splitting the interval.


: '''CLAIM 1a''': Two smallest intervals among the bottom-right edge <math>(m, N)</math> and <math>(N, n)</math> are the splitting of a *step* of a scale one generator less.
: '''CLAIM 1a''': Two smallest intervals among the bottom-right edge <math>(m, N)</math> and <math>(N, n)</math> are the splitting of a ''step'' of a scale one generator less.
: '''CLAIM 1b''': Only one of ''m'', ''n'' can be zero, that is, at least one new step has a size that appears already at this point.
: '''CLAIM 1b''': Only one of ''m'', ''n'' can be zero, that is, at least one new step has a size that appears already at this point.
:: ''(To be proven later.)''
:: ''(To be proven later.)''