User:Dave Keenan/sandbox: Difference between revisions

Line 90:

|+ Sagittal bad-fifths limma-fraction accidentals

|-

! colspan="2" | Up symbol !! rowspan="2" | Pronunciation (~~sagispeak~~) !! rowspan="2" | Limma fractions represented

! colspan="2" | Up symbol !! rowspan="2" | Pronunciation (Sagispeak) !! rowspan="2" | Limma fractions represented

|-

! [[Sagittal#Evo|Evo]] !! [[Sagittal#Revo|Revo]]

Line 102:

| colspan="2" | {{sagittal| (|\ }} || jakai || 3/5, 2/3, 3/4

|-

| E-F{{nbhsp}}{{sagittal| !( }} || {{sagittal| ||) }}|| ~~ee-eff~~ nao || 4/5, 5/6

| E-F{{nbhsp}}{{sagittal| !( }} || {{sagittal| ||) }}|| limmai nao || 4/5, 5/6

|-

| E-F || {{sagittal| ||\ }}|| ~~ee-eff~~ || 1

| E-F || {{sagittal| ||\ }}|| limmai || 1

|}

The corresponding down notations replace E-F with F-E (or B-C with C-B) and mirror the sagittals vertically, while their pronunciations replace ~~"ee-eff" with "eff-ee" and swap~~ "ai" (high) and "ao" (down) endings~~. The pronunciations "ee-eff" and "eff-ee" come from the interval E-F being a limma~~.

The corresponding down notations replace E-F with F-E (or B-C with C-B) and mirror the sagittals vertically, while their pronunciations replace "ai" (high) and "ao" (down) endings.

The following table shows all the rose EDOs/ETs. Notice how the notation of subsets is preserved; there are never two different symbols in the same column.

Line 115:

|-

! rowspan="2" | EDOs b-ETs !! rowspan="2" | [[Sharpness#~~EF-ness~~|~~EF-ness~~]] !! colspan="13" | Limma fraction

! rowspan="2" | EDOs b-ETs !! rowspan="2" | [[Sharpness#limmanosity|Limmanosity]] !! colspan="13" | Limma fraction

|-

! 0 !! 1/6 !! 1/5 !! 1/4 !! 1/3 !! 2/5 !! 1/2 !! 3/5 !! 2/3 !! 3/4 !! 4/5 !! 5/6 !! 1

@@ Line 90: / Line 90: @@
 |+ Sagittal bad-fifths limma-fraction accidentals
 |-
-! colspan="2" | Up symbol !! rowspan="2" | Pronunciation<br />(sagispeak) !! rowspan="2" | Limma fractions<br />represented
+! colspan="2" | Up symbol !! rowspan="2" | Pronunciation<br />(Sagispeak) !! rowspan="2" | Limma fractions<br />represented
 |-
 ! [[Sagittal#Evo|Evo]] !! [[Sagittal#Revo|Revo]]
@@ Line 102: / Line 102: @@
 | colspan="2" | {{sagittal| (|\ }} || jakai || 3/5, 2/3, 3/4
 |-
-| E-F{{nbhsp}}{{sagittal|  !( }} || {{sagittal| ||) }}|| ee-eff nao || 4/5, 5/6
+| E-F{{nbhsp}}{{sagittal|  !( }} || {{sagittal| ||) }}|| limmai nao || 4/5, 5/6
 |-
-| E-F || {{sagittal| ||\ }}|| ee-eff || 1
+| E-F || {{sagittal| ||\ }}|| limmai || 1
 |}
-The corresponding down notations replace E-F with F-E (or B-C with C-B) and mirror the sagittals vertically, while their pronunciations replace "ee-eff" with "eff-ee" and swap "ai" (high) and "ao" (down) endings. The pronunciations "ee-eff" and "eff-ee" come from the interval E-F being a limma.
+The corresponding down notations replace E-F with F-E (or B-C with C-B) and mirror the sagittals vertically, while their pronunciations replace "ai" (high) and "ao" (down) endings.
 The following table shows all the rose EDOs/ETs. Notice how the notation of subsets is preserved; there are never two different symbols in the same column.
@@ Line 115: / Line 115: @@
 |-
 |-
-! rowspan="2" | EDOs<br />b-ETs !! rowspan="2" | [[Sharpness#EF-ness|EF-ness]] !! colspan="13" | Limma fraction
+! rowspan="2" | EDOs<br />b-ETs !! rowspan="2" | [[Sharpness#limmanosity|Limmanosity]] !! colspan="13" | Limma fraction
 |-
 ! 0  !! 1/6 !! 1/5 !! 1/4 !! 1/3 !! 2/5 !! 1/2 !! 3/5 !! 2/3 !! 3/4 !! 4/5 !! 5/6 !!  1