Lucius Chiaraviglio
Joined 12 February 2024
No edit summary |
→Functional Harmony: Answer to last addition about Functional Harmony |
||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
:::::::: For me, the 22edo fifth definitely passes as different to my ears- specifically, it registers as something akin to 128/85. | :::::::: For me, the 22edo fifth definitely passes as different to my ears- specifically, it registers as something akin to 128/85. | ||
:::::::: Regarding the last section, the motions indicated are not meant to reflect the direction of resolution, rather they simply indicate possible changes, and I have yet to add all of the possible transformations. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 17:03, 14 October 2024 (UTC) | :::::::: Regarding the last section, the motions indicated are not meant to reflect the direction of resolution, rather they simply indicate possible changes, and I have yet to add all of the possible transformations. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 17:03, 14 October 2024 (UTC) | ||
::::::::: Just intonation 7/6 and 8/7 definitely sound like different classes of interval to me, although some temperaments (notably 19EDO, and Negri more generally) conflate them. | |||
::::::::: I just realized I didn't say very clearly what I meant about different fifths -- what I meant is that while the 31EDO and quarter-comma meantone fifths (on the flat side) and 22EDO fifth (on the sharp side) sound different from 3/2, they sound like mistuned versions of it to me, as opposed to sounding like something that is supposed to be different. | |||
::::::::: Maybe I got confused about what you meant in the last section. | |||
::::::::: [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 21:22, 14 October 2024 (UTC) | |||