User talk:Lériendil: Difference between revisions

Line 1:

== From Godtone ==

TY sincerely for helping with the [[diaschismic-kleismic equivalence continuum]], I couldn't have done it without you. I hope you like the final form of the page; I've tried to make it absolutely as simultaneously elegant, detailed and comprehensive as I know how to. It's nice that basically every temperament lies somewhere at a simple (half-integer) place on one of the two main continuums; the main exception is the 34 & 142 temperament, which is truly fractional. What do you think about adding half-integer points to the main table too? Almost everything corresponds to a notable temperament, but maybe it makes the main table too long? --[[User:Godtone|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone|talk]]) 01:15, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

: Hmm... actually, every temperament lies at a half-integer point! 34 & 142 is at 4.5 on the first continuum. That means we have the option of getting rid of the fractional temperaments section! Though it might still be useful to keep to see what temperaments are ''uniquely'' fractional w.r.t. both continua. What do you think (if you have a preference)? --[[User:Godtone|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone|talk]]) 01:32, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == From Godtone ==
 TY sincerely for helping with the [[diaschismic-kleismic equivalence continuum]], I couldn't have done it without you. I hope you like the final form of the page; I've tried to make it absolutely as simultaneously elegant, detailed and comprehensive as I know how to. It's nice that basically every temperament lies somewhere at a simple (half-integer) place on one of the two main continuums; the main exception is the 34 & 142 temperament, which is truly fractional. What do you think about adding half-integer points to the main table too? Almost everything corresponds to a notable temperament, but maybe it makes the main table too long? --[[User:Godtone|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone|talk]]) 01:15, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
+: Hmm... actually, every temperament lies at a half-integer point! 34 & 142 is at 4.5 on the first continuum. That means we have the option of getting rid of the fractional temperaments section! Though it might still be useful to keep to see what temperaments are ''uniquely'' fractional w.r.t. both continua. What do you think (if you have a preference)? --[[User:Godtone|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone|talk]]) 01:32, 24 July 2024 (UTC)