User talk:BudjarnLambeth/Batch 89 temperaments: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m Replied |
|||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
That's equivalent to 2.9+.9-.89 (with a dual harmonic 9). [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 18:15, 13 June 2023 (UTC) | That's equivalent to 2.9+.9-.89 (with a dual harmonic 9). [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 18:15, 13 June 2023 (UTC) | ||
: Thanks for pointing this out. I have added both the raw and normalised bases beneath each temperament’s heading, so that people can view both. | :Thanks for pointing this out. I have added both the raw and normalised bases beneath each temperament’s heading, so that people can view both. | ||
:Later | :Later, I will go through and update all the tables and other information to use the normalised bases because that will be simpler and easier to follow. --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 22:23, 13 June 2023 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 22:29, 13 June 2023
Normalize subgroup bases?
> 2.6.66.89
That's equivalent to 2.3.11.89.
> 2.20.55.89
That's equivalent to 2.5.11.89.
> 2.12.62.89
That's equivalent to 2.3.31.89
> 2.18.72.89
That's equivalent to 2.9+.9-.89 (with a dual harmonic 9). FloraC (talk) 18:15, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for pointing this out. I have added both the raw and normalised bases beneath each temperament’s heading, so that people can view both.
- Later, I will go through and update all the tables and other information to use the normalised bases because that will be simpler and easier to follow. --BudjarnLambeth (talk) 22:23, 13 June 2023 (UTC)