Talk:Diamond-mos notation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
CompactStar (talk | contribs) →Special status of diatonic: new section |
CompactStar (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== Special status of diatonic == | == Special status of diatonic == | ||
I wanted to know, why does diatonic use standard notation (ABC, #/b) while non-diatonic uses different notation (J, &/@)? It can't be for distinctiveness purposes because everything non-diatonic uses identical notation. So if a lot of MOSes will be sharing the same notation anyway, we could | I wanted to know, why does diatonic use standard notation (ABC, #/b) while non-diatonic uses different notation (J, &/@)? It can't be for distinctiveness purposes because everything non-diatonic uses identical notation. So if a lot of MOSes will be sharing the same notation anyway, we could use the "ABC" notation for both diatonic and non-diatonic MOS to avoid people having to learn new note names and accidentals. | ||
[[User:CompactStar|CompactStar]] ([[User talk:CompactStar|talk]]) 19:55, 6 June 2023 (UTC) | [[User:CompactStar|CompactStar]] ([[User talk:CompactStar|talk]]) 19:55, 6 June 2023 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 19:56, 6 June 2023
Just glancing at this, haven't read through it yet. Perhaps ^ could be called "caret" and v could be "vee", analogous to am and at. This might help avoid confusion with my usage of ups and downs. --TallKite (talk) 03:59, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
- I would argue that ups and downs have gotten consensus in the community that goes beyond the rules of your original standard. Diamond-mos ups and downs have the same meaning on the staff as yours (most of the time?); only the text rules are different. If people use ups and downs one way or the other, they can clarify their use by saying which standard they're using. I think us using ups and downs helps cut down on memorization, since it's an element most microtonalists already know. SupahstarSaga (talk) 17:41, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Special status of diatonic
I wanted to know, why does diatonic use standard notation (ABC, #/b) while non-diatonic uses different notation (J, &/@)? It can't be for distinctiveness purposes because everything non-diatonic uses identical notation. So if a lot of MOSes will be sharing the same notation anyway, we could use the "ABC" notation for both diatonic and non-diatonic MOS to avoid people having to learn new note names and accidentals.
CompactStar (talk) 19:55, 6 June 2023 (UTC)