Xenharmonic Wiki

80th-octave temperaments: Difference between revisions

← Older editNewer edit →
VisualWikitext
Eliora (talk | contribs)
autopatrolled, emailconfirmed
3,499 edits
→Mercury: just calculated that myself since there's only 3 vals and 2320 has worse te error so it doesn't count
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs)
autopatrolled, emailconfirmed
5,171 edits
"optimal GPV sequence" → "optimal ET sequence", per Talk:Optimal_ET_sequence
Line 19: Line 19:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): ~7381125/5619712 = 471.7339
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): ~7381125/5619712 = 471.7339


{{Val list|legend=1| 720, 1600, 2320, 3920 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 720, 1600, 2320, 3920 }}


[[Badness]]: 1.49
[[Badness]]: 1.49
Line 32: Line 32:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~2278125/1734656 = 471.7342
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~2278125/1734656 = 471.7342


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 720, 1600, 2320, 3920 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 720, 1600, 2320, 3920 }}


Badness: 0.178
Badness: 0.178
Line 45: Line 45:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~130/99 = 471.7322
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~130/99 = 471.7322


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 720, 1600, 2320, 3920 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 720, 1600, 2320, 3920 }}


Badness: 0.0741
Badness: 0.0741
Retrieved from "https://en.xen.wiki/w/80th-octave_temperaments"