User:FloraC/Critique on D&D's terminology: Difference between revisions

Line 70: Line 70:
On the other hand, the monzo is not the ket, nor should it really include kets by definition. A monzo can be rendered with kets, like {{ket| -4 4 -1 }}, or brackets with the transpose symbol, like [-4 4 -1]<sup>T</sup>, or parentheses and comma separators, like (-4, 4, -1). Just as emphasis can be rendered using italic, bold or underscore. The common spirit among these rendering is the bracketed and appropriately spaced part.  
On the other hand, the monzo is not the ket, nor should it really include kets by definition. A monzo can be rendered with kets, like {{ket| -4 4 -1 }}, or brackets with the transpose symbol, like [-4 4 -1]<sup>T</sup>, or parentheses and comma separators, like (-4, 4, -1). Just as emphasis can be rendered using italic, bold or underscore. The common spirit among these rendering is the bracketed and appropriately spaced part.  


I will not have a problem with Plainsound Music Edition's ''harmonic space coordinates'' as a synonym of ''monzo'', because a list of coordinates is indeed a form of presentation. ''Monzo'' has the advantage that it is concise – more on the name side than on the description side.  
I will not have a problem with Plainsound Music Edition's ''harmonic space coordinates'' as a synonym of ''monzo'', because a list of coordinates is indeed a form of presentation. ''Monzo'' has the advantage that it is concise – more on the name side than on the description side. A name points to a definition with minimal connotations at face value, whereas a description stays intermediate between the conciseness of a name and the rigor of a definition – and so it does not work as a replacement of either.  


My suggestion: use ''monzo'', and if you need to explain it, try saying they are ''harmonic space coordinates''.
My suggestion: use ''monzo'', and if you need to explain it, try saying they are ''harmonic space coordinates''.