User talk:CompactStar/Ed8/5: Difference between revisions
CompactStar (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
CompactStar (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
[[User:CompactStar|CompactStar]] ([[User talk:CompactStar|talk]]) 01:28, 15 March 2023 (UTC) | [[User:CompactStar|CompactStar]] ([[User talk:CompactStar|talk]]) 01:28, 15 March 2023 (UTC) | ||
:: I mean moving the content to interval pages. Beside from EDO and EDT which have more historic context and therefore justify a split, most of the content in pages like this one can be summarized on the [[equal-step tuning]] page, and whatever is specific to that family of tunings is probably related to the interval anyway. The links to each individual tuning could be moved to the interval page. --[[User:Fredg999|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999|talk]]) 02:06, 15 March 2023 (UTC) | :: I mean moving the content to interval pages. Beside from EDO and EDT which have more historic context and therefore justify a split, most of the content in pages like this one can be summarized on the [[equal-step tuning]] page, and whatever is specific to that family of tunings is probably related to the interval anyway. The links to each individual tuning could be moved to the interval page. --[[User:Fredg999|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999|talk]]) 02:06, 15 March 2023 (UTC) | ||
:: Okay. I don't see any problem with merging the interval pages with ET pages, and the quality of stubs like [[8/3]] would be improved when merging them with [[Ed8/3]] anyways. Although, I suggest [[EDF]] should also be kept as-is due to being | :: Okay. I don't see any problem with merging the interval pages with ET pages, and the quality of stubs like [[8/3]] would be improved when merging them with [[Ed8/3]] anyways. Although, I suggest [[EDF]] should also be kept as-is due to being explored a lot like EDO and EDT. [[User:CompactStar|CompactStar]] ([[User talk:CompactStar|talk]]) 02:21, 15 March 2023 (UTC) | ||