Talk:44/27: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Created page with "== Naming this interval == Hey, Xenwolf, have you checked what I said on Ray's talk page about naming 44/27? --~~~~" |
→Naming this interval: re (pausing now) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Hey, Xenwolf, have you checked what I said on Ray's talk page about naming 44/27? --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 23:08, 24 November 2020 (UTC) | Hey, Xenwolf, have you checked what I said on Ray's talk page about naming 44/27? --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 23:08, 24 November 2020 (UTC) | ||
: I think it's better you add the names. <small>''... and please be respectful to already existing names!''😉</small> --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 23:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
:: Well, I know I would include the existing names in the articles... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 23:20, 24 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
::: Isn't [[44/27]] also a rastmic interval (being the complement of [[27/22]])? --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 23:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
:::: Conventionally, yes, but in Alpharabian tuning, things are more complicated. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 23:36, 24 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
::::: Fantastic. Thanks! --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 23:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC) | |||