Talk:Ed4: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Mike Battaglia (talk | contribs)
m Text replacement - "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''" to "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.''' <span style="color:#800000">''...
Mike Battaglia (talk | contribs)
m 1 revision imported: Moving archived Wikispaces discussion to subpage
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
= ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =
{{WSArchiveLink}}
'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''
 
<span style="color:#800000">'''PLEASE MAKE ANY NEW COMMENTS <u>ABOVE</u> THIS SECTION.'''</span> Anything below here is for archival purposes only.
 
----
 
== 'Double Octave' ==
Hi Andrew, 'Double Octave' sounds like a 16/1 ratio. Why not Quadruplave? Quadruplave sounds more consistent for designate the 4/1 ratio. Is not 'Octave' the same thing that 'Eighth', the equivalent to 8/1 ratio?
 
I and others stop referring to the frequential duple (or Duplave) as the 'Octave', since it is a tremendous inconsistency for technical reference in the designation of harmonic ratios.
 
The list of ratios 'x/1' can be:
 
1/1 - Unison, 'Monoave'
 
2/1 - Duple, Duplave
 
3/1 - Triple, Tritave
 
4/1 - Quadruple, Quadruplave, 'Quadruve'
 
5/1 - Qintuple, Pentave, (Fifth?)
 
6/1 - Sixtuple, Hexave, (Sixth?)
 
7/1 - Septuple, Heptave, (Seventh?)
 
8/1 - Octuple, &lt;legitimally Octave&gt;, (Eighth?)
 
9/1 - Enneatuple, Nonave, (Ninth?)
 
10/1 - Decatuple, Decave, (Tenth?)
 
11/1 - Undecatuple, Undecave, (Eleventh?)
 
12/1 - Dodecatuple, Dodecave, (Twelfth?)
 
13/1 - Tredecatuple, Tredecave, (Thirteenth?)
 
14/1 - Quardecatuple, Quardecave, (Fourteenth?)
 
What do you think?
 
???'????'
 
- '''Osmiorisbendi''' November 19, 2011, 08:59:51 PM UTC-0800
----
I think "Double Octave" is perfectly clear, and have seen other people refer to the "Double Octave" before.  Yes, "octave" is something of a misnomer, and from a certain point of view, "duple" makes a lot more sense -- but everybody knows what an octave is -- it's still a standard name for the 2/1.  I've also heard "triple octave" -- referring to 8/1 ratio -- and I think that's just as clear.  However, I'm not opposed to Quadruple as an additional name.  I don't like Quadruplave or Quadruve at all, but would not object to their inclusion.  However, I wouldn't want to take away "double octave".
 
- '''Andrew_Heathwaite''' November 21, 2011, 07:39:39 PM UTC-0800
----

Latest revision as of 18:02, 1 October 2018

This page also contains archived Wikispaces discussion.