|
|
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| = ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =
| | {{WSArchiveLink}} |
| '''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''
| |
| ----
| |
|
| |
|
| == Whaa? == | | == Move proposal == |
| "Epimorphic: Something silly that basically means your scale is non-negative, or something like that. The diatonic scale is epimorphic in general."
| |
|
| |
|
| This makes zero sense.
| | To be honest, this doesn't really 'simplify' much. I think we better call this page something like "glossary of scale properties". |
|
| |
|
| - '''genewardsmith''' March 23, 2012, 02:04:04 PM UTC-0700
| | – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 00:08, 17 April 2025 (UTC) |
| ----
| |
| I actually didn't understand the difference between weakly epimorphic and epimorphic. Keenan told me the difference wasn't too important. You can edit it though if you want.
| |
| | |
| - '''Sarzadoce''' March 23, 2012, 05:13:27 PM UTC-0700
| |
| ----
| |
| Looking better now, looking better.
| |
| | |
| - '''keenanpepper''' March 24, 2012, 08:13:06 AM UTC-0700
| |
| ----
| |
| A scale is weakly epimorphic if, under some val, all scale degrees are "filled,"
| |
| | |
| Huh?
| |
| | |
| - '''clumma''' September 21, 2012, 12:18:39 PM UTC-0700
| |
| ----
| |
| Is that not clear enough?
| |
| | |
| - '''Sarzadoce''' September 21, 2012, 08:36:30 PM UTC-0700
| |
| ----
| |