Talk:11edo: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Wikispaces>FREEZE
No edit summary
 
Sintel (talk | contribs)
m typo
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
= ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =
{{WSArchiveLink}}
'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''
----


== A modest suggerence for 11-EDD notation ==
== Please check mapping of 9-limit intervals ==
Is possible that i put a notation based on the MOSscale 222221, like this:
Someone private messaged me on Facebook because I'm a wiki editor, but I didn't feel confident dealing with the thing they talked about so I'm posting it here so someone more confident and experienced can deal with it:


Cent-Name-Step
"The wiki page for 11EDO might need brushing up in regards to consistency, since it keeps referring to the "correct" 9-limit intervals, but the listed val in 3-limit cannot produce those 🤔 Because the 3rd harmonic is so flat, it would put 9/8 at 1\11 edosteps, but the page keeps referring it to 2\11."


0 - Q - 0
: I don't really see the issue. Mapping 9/8 to 1\11 seems absurd, and the interval table does state that it's based on the 2.9 subgroup and not 2.3.  
 
: Maybe the confusion is because in the regular temperament properties the full 13-limit [11 17 26 31 38 41] is assumed (which is questionable for sure).
109 - Q# - 1
: – [[User:Sintel|<span style="color:#965d99">Sintel</span>🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 22:55, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
 
218 - R - 2
 
327 - R# - 3
 
436 - S - 4
 
545 - S# - 5
 
655 - T - 6
 
764 - T# - 7
 
873 - U - 8
 
982 - U# - 9
 
1091 - P\Qb - 10
 
1200 - Q\P# - 11\0
 
The letters are P, Q, R, S, T and U.
 
Greetings \\\'\\\\'
 
- '''Osmiorisbendi''' November 19, 2011, 09:25:31 PM UTC-0800
----
Sure, that's based around machine[6]. Although I'd suggest the 221222 mode as base, though...
 
- '''mbattaglia1''' November 19, 2011, 09:56:02 PM UTC-0800
----
Thanks, Mike. So, the MOSscale 5L1s is called Machine?
 
Ok (;
 
- '''Osmiorisbendi''' November 20, 2011, 09:08:03 PM UTC-0800
----
 
== Dan Stearns? ==
Works by Dan Stearns have been repeatedly inserted and deleted again. Why that?
 
- '''hstraub''' April 08, 2008, 01:30:03 AM UTC-0700
----
Who did the deleting?
 
- '''genewardsmith''' March 28, 2011, 10:47:17 PM UTC-0700
----
The deleting was always done by a guest. But it seems that the link target istn't available any more.
 
- '''xenwolf''' March 28, 2011, 11:56:28 PM UTC-0700
----
here I googled some infos, (links also broken)
 
http://www.musik-news.org/post/12124/thinking_outside_the_box...and_the_circle_of_fifths.html
 
but look *here* :)
 
http://clones.soonlabel.com/public/micro/dan-stearns/individual-files-20100308/
 
- '''xenwolf''' March 29, 2011, 12:02:23 AM UTC-0700
----
I think it was Dan Stearns himself who deleted them.
 
- '''hstraub''' March 29, 2011, 12:03:03 AM UTC-0700
----
Do you know him? Doesn't he want to be listed here?
 
- '''xenwolf''' March 29, 2011, 12:16:33 AM UTC-0700
----
I remember some e-mails I exchanged with someone who had deleted links to his music on the xenwiki, and he explicitly said he did not wanted the links. But I do not remember whether it was Dan Stearns. I will check tonight at home.
 
- '''hstraub''' March 29, 2011, 05:11:13 AM UTC-0700
----

Latest revision as of 22:55, 13 February 2025

This page also contains archived Wikispaces discussion.

Please check mapping of 9-limit intervals

Someone private messaged me on Facebook because I'm a wiki editor, but I didn't feel confident dealing with the thing they talked about so I'm posting it here so someone more confident and experienced can deal with it:

"The wiki page for 11EDO might need brushing up in regards to consistency, since it keeps referring to the "correct" 9-limit intervals, but the listed val in 3-limit cannot produce those 🤔 Because the 3rd harmonic is so flat, it would put 9/8 at 1\11 edosteps, but the page keeps referring it to 2\11."

I don't really see the issue. Mapping 9/8 to 1\11 seems absurd, and the interval table does state that it's based on the 2.9 subgroup and not 2.3.
Maybe the confusion is because in the regular temperament properties the full 13-limit [11 17 26 31 38 41] is assumed (which is questionable for sure).
Sintel🎏 (talk) 22:55, 13 February 2025 (UTC)