User talk:FloraC/Sandbox: Difference between revisions

(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)

Line 16:

:: So new template for sure, but where will it be linked to? [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 08:48, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

::: Maybe in a way like this: <code><nowiki>[[Val|Vals]]: [[24edo#Vals|24p]], [[135edo#Vals|135p]], [[159edo|159]], [[183edo|183]], </nowiki></code> etc.? Or maybe better with <code><nowiki>[[Val|EDO vals]]:</nowiki></code> before the list? However, it seems to me that the val article we want to link to doesn't really welcome newbies, this is especially true for the "defining" section: ''A val is a map? representing(?) how to (view the intervals)? in a (single(?) chain)? of generators? as the tempered? versions of intervals in just intonation(?)'' ...I tried to give an impression of the known-to-unknown ratio in the first sentence. This is what I hate about the writing style of mathematicians: you are given the impression that you have to know all the parts of a concept before you can understand any one of them. So there is still something to do. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 17:15, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:48, 3 February 2021 view source FloraC (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Sysops 18,309 edits →EDOs vs. Vals: re ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 17:21, 3 February 2021 view source Xenwolf (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, confirmaccount-notify, Interface administrators, Sysops 8,705 edits →EDOs vs. Vals: formatting
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 16:		Line 16:

	:: So new template for sure, but where will it be linked to? [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 08:48, 3 February 2021 (UTC)		:: So new template for sure, but where will it be linked to? [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 08:48, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

			::: Maybe in a way like this: <code><nowiki>[[Val\|Vals]]: [[24edo#Vals\|24p]], [[135edo#Vals\|135p]], [[159edo\|159]], [[183edo\|183]], </nowiki></code> etc.? <br> Or maybe better with <code><nowiki>[[Val\|EDO vals]]:</nowiki></code> before the list? <br> However, it seems to me that the val article we want to link to doesn't really welcome newbies, this is especially true for the "defining" section: <br>''A val is a <u>map</u><sup>?</sup> <u>representing</u><sup><sup>(?)</sup></sup> how to (<u>view</u> the intervals)<sup>?</sup> in a (<u>single</u><sup><sup>(?)</sup></sup> <u>chain</u>)<sup>?</sup> of <u>generators</u><sup>?</sup> as the <u>tempered</u><sup>?</sup> versions of intervals in <u>just intonation</u><sup><sup>(?)</sup></sup>'' <br> ...I tried to give an impression of the known-to-unknown ratio in the first sentence. This is what I hate about the writing style of mathematicians: you are given the impression that you have to know all the parts of a concept before you can understand any one of them. <br> So there is still something to do. --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 17:15, 3 February 2021 (UTC)