Whynotmicrotonality: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Wikispaces>igliashon
**Imported revision 413972748 - Original comment: **
m fixed typö
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<h2>IMPORTED REVISION FROM WIKISPACES</h2>
=Why NOT Microtonality: The Perils and Pitfalls of Going from "Musician" to "Microtonalist"=
This is an imported revision from Wikispaces. The revision metadata is included below for reference:<br>
: This revision was by author [[User:igliashon|igliashon]] and made on <tt>2013-03-11 16:47:00 UTC</tt>.<br>
: The original revision id was <tt>413972748</tt>.<br>
: The revision comment was: <tt></tt><br>
The revision contents are below, presented both in the original Wikispaces Wikitext format, and in HTML exactly as Wikispaces rendered it.<br>
<h4>Original Wikitext content:</h4>
<div style="width:100%; max-height:400pt; overflow:auto; background-color:#f8f9fa; border: 1px solid #eaecf0; padding:0em"><pre style="margin:0px;border:none;background:none;word-wrap:break-word;white-space: pre-wrap ! important" class="old-revision-html">=Why NOT Microtonality: The Trials and Tribulations of My Xenharmonic Life=  


My name is Igliashon Jones, and I am a microtonalist. I have been in recovery since the 11th of December, 2012. I would like to think of myself as simply "a musician" and not "a microtonalist", but microtonality (like any addiction) is not something you can actually quit. I've done everything I can think to try to quit it--taking down all my microtonal music from the web, editing my name out of this wiki, quitting the online forums at Facebook and Yahoo, selling my microtonal instruments, deleting all my writings and theory documents off my computer, even writing lots of really angry anti-microtonal rants and burning bridges with people I once considered colleagues. But it's still with me, and it probably always will be. 7 years of obsessive study will do that to a person. At this point, all I can legitimately hope for is to control the damage it's done to my music-making, and maybe in the long run microtonal theory will just be absorbed back into the larger context of music-making.
My name is Igliashon Jones, and I identified as a microtonalist for a solid 7 years of my life. The purpose of this article is to explain why I stopped identifying as one, and why I think more people should stop identifying themselves this way (or never start in the first place). For the purposes of this op-ed, I'm going to use the term "microtonality" to refer more to a particular disposition to alternative tunings, rather than simply the use of alternative tunings. This is important, because it is my view that it is entirely possible to use tunings other than 12-TET without using "microtonality", without making "microtonal" music, and certainly without becoming "a microtonalist".  


//Wait, what? What do you mean, "the damage it's done to your music-making"? I thought microtonality was supposed to be a liberation from the confines of 12-TET, and thus an incredible boon to the creative process?//
So what is "microtonality", as I'm using the term? Simply put, microtonality is the belief that tunings (and theoretical ideas about tunings) have immense musical importance, generally above and beyond any other single aspect of music (and occasionally above and beyond ''all'' other aspects of music). That is to say, when one becomes a microtonalist and adopts the principles of microtonality, one often finds oneself engaged in composing, seeking out, listening to, and/or discussing music which, were it not in an alternative tuning, one would generally find unremarkable (if not outright detestable). For example, re-tuned MIDI files, cheesy Csound renderings, amaturish guitar plunkings, or even simply music that falls well outside of one's normal tastes. In fact, one may even become fanatically devoted to this sort of music, perhaps even losing touch with musical taste all together.


I thought so, too. And maybe it can be, but what is important to acknowledge--and seldom discussed within the community--is that it can actually be detrimental to music-making, at least if you make the same mistakes I did. So, in the interest of sparing others the same tribulations I went through, I'm going to list the mistakes I made that ultimately led me to a creative crisis and emotional melt-down, and caused me to wish I'd never heard the word "microtonal" in my life.
Another typical aspect of microtonality (as opposed to simply "making music with alternative tunings") is that one generally spends a majority (or even the entirety) of one's music-related time creating, discovering, and/or exploring new tunings, either in theory or in composition. A microtonalist who uses only a single alternative tuning is basically unheard of, and any person who ''does'' only use a single alternative tuning probably doesn't identify as "a microtonalist". Microtonality as a movement suffers from an intense form of attention deficit disorder, which prevents any real musical progress from being made: this ADD ensures that musical collaboration is rare and short-lived, or indeed ''any'' in-depth exploration of an alternative tuning. One only needs to spend a week on a microtonal discussion forum (such as the facebook "Xenharmonic Alliance") to see this ADD in action--rarely (if ever) can a single tuning hold the focus of any one person, let alone the whole group. This is, of course, by design--a core principle of microtonality is that there is no one "best" tuning, because different tunings are good for different things, and so everyone must be free to choose tunings at will, just as they would choose tempo, rhythm, orchestration, dynamics (etc.). Nevermind the fact that few people (if any) ever spend long enough with a tuning to actually figure out what it is and is not good for, or the fact that few (if any) can even agree on which tunings are good or bad for which musical purposes. The acceptance of the validity and utility of infinitely-many tunings is the central dogma of microtonality and is never questioned.


==Mistake #1: Trying to De-Twelvulate My Hearing==
All of this is extremely hazardous to the musician. To enter the microtonal world, one is compelled either to bite the bullet and climb the learning curve to assimilate all the available information on all the available tunings (even if all one wants is to find a single good tuning), or else one can simply dig in to a scale library and explore as many tunings as one can without giving a thought to the theoretical considerations behind them. Neither approach tends to aid the composer in producing better music--one easily either gets lost in exhibiting the various theoretical properties of tunings, or gets lost in the tunings themselves. The fact that composing and producing microtonal music severely limits one's choices of instrumentation (due to the incompatibility of most major soft- and hardware synthesizers with alternative tunings, as well as the lack of readily-available alternative-tuning-friendly acoustic instruments) is also significant; the microtonalist often has to make do with subpar or homemade equipment, or pay a premium price for custom-constructed instruments. This last aspect is especially detrimental when combined with the ADD typical of microtonalists--it is rare that any microtonalist bothers to build or purchase multiple instruments in the same tuning.


I've seen at least a few people make the distinct claim that strange new tunings require a period of adjustment before they start to sound "natural". While I did find it to be the case that the sound of new tunings can become less bothersome with repeated exposure, no amount of immersion in microtonal tunings ever "cured me" of my 12-TET perceptual categories. No matter how foreign the harmonies or how unlike the diatonic scale, no amount of time ever got me to stop hearing things as just variations on the musical categories I grew up with. It was a constant and futile struggle on my part to keep these 12-TET categories from informing my music, but I was desperately committed to it. For at least two solid years, I played and composed only microtonal music--I didn't dare write or play in 12-TET, for fear it would forever prevent me from realizing my full xenharmonic potential.
But perhaps the worst part of being a microtonalist is the loss of healthy perspective. Oftentimes the adoption of microtonality leads one to scorn "regular" music and to treat 12-tone equal temperament with disdain. The healthiest microtonalists are those who ''don't'' subscribe to the anti-12 rhetoric, and maintain at least one foot firmly planted in the 12-tet world, continuing to play "regular" music with "regular" musicians (although, these folks are seldom prolific composers in alternative tunings). Those who choose instead to detach from the musical community at large and plunge with both feet into microtonality--which is precisely what ''I'' did--can completely lose touch with the outside world, and develop a delusional sense of the importance of the microtonal "movement" (or rather, the delusion that there ''is'' a microtonal movement at all, and that it is important). This sort of delusion can and does lead people to get all kinds of worked up over trivial matters; I was an especially potent and recent case of this, but the history of the various online tuning groups is rife with other examples.  


The only problem was, any time I succeeded in making music that sounded extremely unlike 12-TET--for instance, using a bunch of quarter-tones in a melody, or playing big near-Just otonal chords--I hated it. My favorite microtonal music, both among my own compositions and those of others, was always the stuff that sounded more or less like something that could be pulled off in 12. When I realized that, I was pretty much forced to admit to myself that I was a hypocrite, and that I was also a complete fool to try to constantly thwart my own taste through my own compositions (and an even bigger fool for being mad at myself for failing at that!).
==How to Use Alternative Tunings ''Without'' Becoming a Microtonalist==


==Mistake #2: Not Knowing What I Wanted From Alternative Tunings==
This is what I'm actively researching right now, because despite my harsh words about microtonality, I do think alternative tunings (or at least, a few alternative tunings) are worthwhile to pursue and develop musically. What I have figured out so far:


The world of tuning theory is riddled with dogma and proselytization, as well as various conflicting ideologies that are constantly vying for attention. Neophytes like I once was are easily taken in. This is a shame, because people--including myself--can be taken in before they have a chance to figure anything out for themselves, and can end up wasting //years// learning about things that are completely irrelevant to their approach to music-making. Much discussion is devoted to making various tuning theories more accessible, but little discussion is devoted to figuring out when theories are and are not relevant in the process of making actual music, or what kinds of music for which they might be relevant at all. This leads many new-comers to the field to be overwhelmed, or to feel the need to learn mountains of esoteric theory just to participate in the discussion. It is quite easy for music-making to go by the way-side during this learning process.
'''1. Don't Quit 12-tet'''


Case in point: I was taken in by a lot of theoretical ideas that proved not to be relevant or useful, simply because I made little to no attempt in the beginning to critically assess whether these ideas were useful enough to me to be worth learning. I entered the tuning world as a //tabula rasa,// when what I should have done was figured out first and foremost what it was in 12-TET that I was and was not satisfied with, and what I hoped to get out of alternative tunings in the first place. Perhaps this was an impossible mistake to avoid at the time; this wiki did not exist, and the community was much smaller and much less diverse (with considerably fewer practicing musicians in it, and particularly fewer rock guitarists like myself), so who could even tell me what possibilities were engendered by alternative tunings? Nevertheless, if I had had clearer goals in mind and the ability to critically asses the relevance of various theories to my personal musical goals, I could have narrowed the field of potential tunings by a good bit, and saved myself a lot of fruitless floundering.
12-tet is a great tuning, and much of the microtonal theory supports it--indeed, much of the theory arose to try to explain ''why'' and ''how'' 12-tet is as awesome as it is. For a tremendous variety of musical applications, there is simply no better tuning. It's okay to acknowledge that, and you don't have to give up your interest in alternative tunings to do so.


==Mistake #3: Unhealthily Obsessing Over Microtonality==
'''2. Commit and Specialize'''


Did I mention I lived and breathed microtonality nearly every day for the better part of 7 years? Well, I did. I spent 95% of my free time either online in the forums or writing music. I just could NOT turn it off. Worse, I used it to build a wall between myself and the "regular" music world. I even turned down some great musical opportunities because they would have required me to play guitar in 12-TET! I was so committed to "the movement" that I lost sight of what mattered, which is making music.
Spend the minimum amount of time possible searching for a tuning you like, and once you find one, spend the rest of your life with it. Become the world's leading expert in it. The bulk of microtonal discussions center around discovering and categorizing tunings; once you pick one and stick to it, you will have no need or desire for those sorts of discussions. Instead, you'll be interested in figuring out how music works in your chosen tuning, and will quickly get past the theoretical exhibitionary phase and start integrating the tuning on a deeper level. If you must, pick a couple, but be warned that the more tunings you try to use, the shorter distance you will progress with any of them.


Another problem with this obsession was that I stopped filtering my interactions. I wanted to spend as much time as possible participating in discussion, which pushed me to weigh in on matters about which I was uninformed and in which I was actually disinterested. I don't actually care a whit about psychoacoustics, music cognition, mathematics, or acoustic physics, let alone any of the more specialized and esoteric terminology and theoretical constructs unique to microtonal theory...but that never stopped me from swaggering into discussions about them, taking sides, and even getting worked up enough to actually get angry with people over disputes. At my worst, I'd take any flame-bait laid before me, even if it was completely unrelated to music, and boy-howdy would I burn for it! Many enemies have I made because of this, and I very definitely did not make the community a better place with my behavior. What I should have done was carve out a little niche for myself and stayed in it; the one thing I was actually good at, knowledgeable about, and legitimately interested in was playing xenharmonic guitar, and I should have just stuck with that. It would have saved a lot of strife both for myself and for my colleagues.
'''3. Understand the True (Lack of) Importance of Tuning in Composition'''


==Mistake #4: Treating Music as Theoretical Exposition Rather than Artistic Expression==
Tuning and intonation are subtle things, compared to rhythm, orchestration, dynamics, and lyrics (in vocal music). One can often wildly alter the intonation of a piece of music without making it unrecognizable, and in many cases alterations may even be unnoticeable to non-expert listeners. For example, diatonic music in 17edo can oftentimes be passed off as "normal", despite intonational variances of more than 30 cents from 12-tet in some intervals. In most cases, a change in timbre is more noticeable than a change in tuning, unless the change in tuning is rather extreme. It all seems to be profoundly challenging to write music that non-expert listeners will both a) recognize as being tuned unusually and b) not hear as "out-of-tune" (and this applies as much to extended JI as it does to exotemperaments). Good music is made by the skillful manipulation of ''all'' compositional parameters, not an obsessive focus on a single one. Especially considering that tuning is nothing more than a particular set of ''constraints'' on harmonic and melodic construction, and is only audible ''through'' harmony and melody.


When I write in 12-TET, I feel a profound sense of artistic responsibility to write music that comes from a deep emotional place, expresses something worthwhile about my experience, and uses melody, harmony, rhythm, and sound design in compelling and innovative ways. When I was writing exclusively-microtonal music, for some reason I didn't feel that same artistic responsibility. Instead, I felt a responsibility to utilize and demonstrate various theoretical ideas (which are in limitless supply for the microtonalist), and I tended to only make token gestures toward my usual quality standards. And it only got worse over time.
'''4. Recognize That There is No "Microtonal Movement"'''


The problem was a sort of "grass is always greener" mindset: I could never stick with one tuning for very long, because there was always another shiny new tuning around the corner whispering promises of theoretical superiority in some new aspect. Because I always chose tunings based on theoretical considerations alone, inevitably those theoretical considerations came to dominate my compositional focus. And if I //didn't// make the theory come through clear enough in the composition--if it was too artistically "free", for example--I considered it a failure, rather than a success.
Movements are unified and cohesive actions undertaken by a coordinated mass of people to achieve a specific and definite set of goals. In the microtonal "community", the lone unifying principle is "not 12-tet", or more properly, "not 12-tet all of the time". There are no unified actions being undertaken, the people are not coordinate, and the set of goals is anything but specific and definite. There is no movement, just a bunch of people from a vast diversity of backgrounds whose obsession with alternative tunings has driven them together. If you feel inclined to the same messianic bent I once had, believing that someday the microtonal movement will overthrow the 12-tet hegemony and replace it with your favorite tuning or even just complete intonational freedom, you should probably seek help. Lord knows I should have.
Thus, my microtonal corpus consists almost entirely of brief forays into a plethora of different tunings, each one focused on some particular scale or form of harmony or some other abstract theoretical principle. Which is precisely why I've felt the need to disown my microtonal corpus, or at least distance myself from it. Regardless of what anyone may think of it, to me it is not art. It is not an expression of my self.


==Mistake #5: Hating on 12-TET==
'''5. Never Stop Having Fun'''


12-TET-bashing used to be a lot more common in the community than it seems to be these days, which is an encouraging sign, but for a long time I was as vehement an anti-12 crusader as anyone. I used to decry 12-TET as being hackneyed, cliched, boring, stifling, washed-up, limiting, and superficial. That was stupid. 12-TET is an excellent tuning, and all the microtonal theory more or less agrees. For some people it may not be the //best//, and there are probably arguments to be made that it should share some space with a few other good tunings. But for me, it really is the holy grail. It's easy to navigate because it divides into more equal parts than any other ET less than double its size--12 has factors of 2, 3, 4, and 6. The fact that it also has very acceptable 5-limit harmony and can at least imply 7- and 9-limit harmony (to say nothing of its good representations of ratios of 15, 17, and 19, which add to its harmonic versatility) is extremely remarkable, bordering on miraculous. It also supports more of the best 5-limit temperaments than its nearest competitors of 15, 19, and 22: meantone, schismatic, srutal, injera, diminished, augmented, ripple, and passion. It's incredible, truly incredible, that such a simple equal temperament could be so good.
This is music, and music is nothing but a pleasant diversional activity to help keep us all sane and happy as our little blue-green spaceship hurtles precariously through the cosmos. Enjoy the heck out it before you do anything else with it. That goes double for the study and application of alternative tunings.


As you can see, my study of microtonality has taken me all the way out the other side, and actually deepened my appreciation for 12-TET, rather than diminishing it.
'''6. Be Honest With Yourself'''


Now that I'm comfortable admitting all the great things about 12-TET, it's given me a completely new perspective on microtonality. No other tuning is going to "beat 12-TET at its own game", and if I want a tuning that does everything I like about 12-TET, then 12-TET is the only tuning worth bothering with. That's fine. For general-purpose music making, I think 12-TET does the best job at serving the greatest number of people in the greatest number of ways. Now that that's been established, it is possible to look in earnest at what alternative tunings actually have to offer that might be appealing, rather than searching hopelessly for something that's "better" than 12-TET and will spark a world-wide tuning revolution.
Admit when something is not working. Admit when the tuning doesn't serve you, or when it's become too much of your focus, or when you just don't like it. Don't be too gentle with yourself, and don't get too hung up on ideology or rhetoric.  


==Mistake #6: Not Sticking With One Tuning==
''(to be continued)''


This ties in a bit with all of the previous mistakes, and is more or less a result of them. Really, I never wanted microtonality to be a vast new universe of infinite possibilities. I wanted something different, but just //one// different thing that would fit me like a glove. Unfortunately I never found a concrete way of formalizing or quantifying what I wanted, so I never figured out what the "best" tuning for my needs would be. What I ended up doing was hopping from tuning to tuning, eventually evolving an "every tuning is good for something!" world-view that made commitment essentially impossible. What I //should// have done is just picked one and stuck to it. I don't think it really even matters which one anymore. 31edo, 22edo, 17edo, 19edo, 16edo, 15edo, 10edo...whatever. Just sticking with one, diving deep, really internalizing its structure, naturalizing the language of its notation, becoming fluid and fluent with it, that's something I never really did. That's something very few people do in this community, and it is reflected in the quality of the music and the near-complete absence of any practice-centered music theory. I think it's possible that if I could just stick with one--just pick one, and build my life's work on it--mistakes #1-5 would cease to be problematic for me.
=See also=
[[Why microtonality|Why microtonality]], [[whynotnotmicrotonality|Whynotnotmicrotonality]]


So I encourage anyone reading this: don't get lost in the hype over various tunings. Come up with a comfortable size-range for yourself, decide how close to JI you care to get, and pick any tuning in your size range that gets you as close as you want to JI...and stick to it! Become an expert in it, catalog its strengths and test its weaknesses, compose a huge repertoire for it, establish some conventions in it, collaborate with others on it. Mine it for everything it's worth! This, I now believe, will be vastly more rewarding over the long haul than flitting from tuning to tuning indefinitely.
[[Category:Why microtonality?]]
 
==Epilogue==
 
When I first made this page, it was a tirade against microtonality, an attempt to warn people away from it and debunk all claims made in its favor. I've since come to take a more tempered perspective on the matter (no pun intended?), though I still believe that microtonality is a tricky pursuit that will not universally serve all musicians (or even a majority of them). I no longer think of it as hopeless and foolish, but I still think it is quite shrouded in rhetoric and falsehoods. However, I think I am at last getting close to figuring out what I want from it and how to get it, as well as what I can offer the community and what I can't. But time will tell, and the jury (as of this writing) is still out.
 
=See also=
[[Why micotonality]], [[Whynotnotmicrotonality]]</pre></div>
<h4>Original HTML content:</h4>
<div style="width:100%; max-height:400pt; overflow:auto; background-color:#f8f9fa; border: 1px solid #eaecf0; padding:0em"><pre style="margin:0px;border:none;background:none;word-wrap:break-word;width:200%;white-space: pre-wrap ! important" class="old-revision-html">&lt;html&gt;&lt;head&gt;&lt;title&gt;whynotmicrotonality&lt;/title&gt;&lt;/head&gt;&lt;body&gt;&lt;!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:0:&amp;lt;h1&amp;gt; --&gt;&lt;h1 id="toc0"&gt;&lt;a name="Why NOT Microtonality: The Trials and Tribulations of My Xenharmonic Life"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;!-- ws:end:WikiTextHeadingRule:0 --&gt;Why NOT Microtonality: The Trials and Tribulations of My Xenharmonic Life&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My name is Igliashon Jones, and I am a microtonalist. I have been in recovery since the 11th of December, 2012. I would like to think of myself as simply &amp;quot;a musician&amp;quot; and not &amp;quot;a microtonalist&amp;quot;, but microtonality (like any addiction) is not something you can actually quit. I've done everything I can think to try to quit it--taking down all my microtonal music from the web, editing my name out of this wiki, quitting the online forums at Facebook and Yahoo, selling my microtonal instruments, deleting all my writings and theory documents off my computer, even writing lots of really angry anti-microtonal rants and burning bridges with people I once considered colleagues. But it's still with me, and it probably always will be. 7 years of obsessive study will do that to a person. At this point, all I can legitimately hope for is to control the damage it's done to my music-making, and maybe in the long run microtonal theory will just be absorbed back into the larger context of music-making.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Wait, what? What do you mean, &amp;quot;the damage it's done to your music-making&amp;quot;? I thought microtonality was supposed to be a liberation from the confines of 12-TET, and thus an incredible boon to the creative process?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I thought so, too. And maybe it can be, but what is important to acknowledge--and seldom discussed within the community--is that it can actually be detrimental to music-making, at least if you make the same mistakes I did. So, in the interest of sparing others the same tribulations I went through, I'm going to list the mistakes I made that ultimately led me to a creative crisis and emotional melt-down, and caused me to wish I'd never heard the word &amp;quot;microtonal&amp;quot; in my life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:2:&amp;lt;h2&amp;gt; --&gt;&lt;h2 id="toc1"&gt;&lt;a name="Why NOT Microtonality: The Trials and Tribulations of My Xenharmonic Life-Mistake #1: Trying to De-Twelvulate My Hearing"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;!-- ws:end:WikiTextHeadingRule:2 --&gt;Mistake #1: Trying to De-Twelvulate My Hearing&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've seen at least a few people make the distinct claim that strange new tunings require a period of adjustment before they start to sound &amp;quot;natural&amp;quot;. While I did find it to be the case that the sound of new tunings can become less bothersome with repeated exposure, no amount of immersion in microtonal tunings ever &amp;quot;cured me&amp;quot; of my 12-TET perceptual categories. No matter how foreign the harmonies or how unlike the diatonic scale, no amount of time ever got me to stop hearing things as just variations on the musical categories I grew up with. It was a constant and futile struggle on my part to keep these 12-TET categories from informing my music, but I was desperately committed to it. For at least two solid years, I played and composed only microtonal music--I didn't dare write or play in 12-TET, for fear it would forever prevent me from realizing my full xenharmonic potential.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The only problem was, any time I succeeded in making music that sounded extremely unlike 12-TET--for instance, using a bunch of quarter-tones in a melody, or playing big near-Just otonal chords--I hated it. My favorite microtonal music, both among my own compositions and those of others, was always the stuff that sounded more or less like something that could be pulled off in 12. When I realized that, I was pretty much forced to admit to myself that I was a hypocrite, and that I was also a complete fool to try to constantly thwart my own taste through my own compositions (and an even bigger fool for being mad at myself for failing at that!).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:4:&amp;lt;h2&amp;gt; --&gt;&lt;h2 id="toc2"&gt;&lt;a name="Why NOT Microtonality: The Trials and Tribulations of My Xenharmonic Life-Mistake #2: Not Knowing What I Wanted From Alternative Tunings"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;!-- ws:end:WikiTextHeadingRule:4 --&gt;Mistake #2: Not Knowing What I Wanted From Alternative Tunings&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The world of tuning theory is riddled with dogma and proselytization, as well as various conflicting ideologies that are constantly vying for attention. Neophytes like I once was are easily taken in. This is a shame, because people--including myself--can be taken in before they have a chance to figure anything out for themselves, and can end up wasting &lt;em&gt;years&lt;/em&gt; learning about things that are completely irrelevant to their approach to music-making. Much discussion is devoted to making various tuning theories more accessible, but little discussion is devoted to figuring out when theories are and are not relevant in the process of making actual music, or what kinds of music for which they might be relevant at all. This leads many new-comers to the field to be overwhelmed, or to feel the need to learn mountains of esoteric theory just to participate in the discussion. It is quite easy for music-making to go by the way-side during this learning process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Case in point: I was taken in by a lot of theoretical ideas that proved not to be relevant or useful, simply because I made little to no attempt in the beginning to critically assess whether these ideas were useful enough to me to be worth learning. I entered the tuning world as a &lt;em&gt;tabula rasa,&lt;/em&gt; when what I should have done was figured out first and foremost what it was in 12-TET that I was and was not satisfied with, and what I hoped to get out of alternative tunings in the first place. Perhaps this was an impossible mistake to avoid at the time; this wiki did not exist, and the community was much smaller and much less diverse (with considerably fewer practicing musicians in it, and particularly fewer rock guitarists like myself), so who could even tell me what possibilities were engendered by alternative tunings? Nevertheless, if I had had clearer goals in mind and the ability to critically asses the relevance of various theories to my personal musical goals, I could have narrowed the field of potential tunings by a good bit, and saved myself a lot of fruitless floundering.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:6:&amp;lt;h2&amp;gt; --&gt;&lt;h2 id="toc3"&gt;&lt;a name="Why NOT Microtonality: The Trials and Tribulations of My Xenharmonic Life-Mistake #3: Unhealthily Obsessing Over Microtonality"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;!-- ws:end:WikiTextHeadingRule:6 --&gt;Mistake #3: Unhealthily Obsessing Over Microtonality&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Did I mention I lived and breathed microtonality nearly every day for the better part of 7 years? Well, I did. I spent 95% of my free time either online in the forums or writing music. I just could NOT turn it off. Worse, I used it to build a wall between myself and the &amp;quot;regular&amp;quot; music world. I even turned down some great musical opportunities because they would have required me to play guitar in 12-TET! I was so committed to &amp;quot;the movement&amp;quot; that I lost sight of what mattered, which is making music.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another problem with this obsession was that I stopped filtering my interactions. I wanted to spend as much time as possible participating in discussion, which pushed me to weigh in on matters about which I was uninformed and in which I was actually disinterested. I don't actually care a whit about psychoacoustics, music cognition, mathematics, or acoustic physics, let alone any of the more specialized and esoteric terminology and theoretical constructs unique to microtonal theory...but that never stopped me from swaggering into discussions about them, taking sides, and even getting worked up enough to actually get angry with people over disputes. At my worst, I'd take any flame-bait laid before me, even if it was completely unrelated to music, and boy-howdy would I burn for it! Many enemies have I made because of this, and I very definitely did not make the community a better place with my behavior. What I should have done was carve out a little niche for myself and stayed in it; the one thing I was actually good at, knowledgeable about, and legitimately interested in was playing xenharmonic guitar, and I should have just stuck with that. It would have saved a lot of strife both for myself and for my colleagues.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:8:&amp;lt;h2&amp;gt; --&gt;&lt;h2 id="toc4"&gt;&lt;a name="Why NOT Microtonality: The Trials and Tribulations of My Xenharmonic Life-Mistake #4: Treating Music as Theoretical Exposition Rather than Artistic Expression"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;!-- ws:end:WikiTextHeadingRule:8 --&gt;Mistake #4: Treating Music as Theoretical Exposition Rather than Artistic Expression&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When I write in 12-TET, I feel a profound sense of artistic responsibility to write music that comes from a deep emotional place, expresses something worthwhile about my experience, and uses melody, harmony, rhythm, and sound design in compelling and innovative ways. When I was writing exclusively-microtonal music, for some reason I didn't feel that same artistic responsibility. Instead, I felt a responsibility to utilize and demonstrate various theoretical ideas (which are in limitless supply for the microtonalist), and I tended to only make token gestures toward my usual quality standards. And it only got worse over time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The problem was a sort of &amp;quot;grass is always greener&amp;quot; mindset: I could never stick with one tuning for very long, because there was always another shiny new tuning around the corner whispering promises of theoretical superiority in some new aspect. Because I always chose tunings based on theoretical considerations alone, inevitably those theoretical considerations came to dominate my compositional focus. And if I &lt;em&gt;didn't&lt;/em&gt; make the theory come through clear enough in the composition--if it was too artistically &amp;quot;free&amp;quot;, for example--I considered it a failure, rather than a success.&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, my microtonal corpus consists almost entirely of brief forays into a plethora of different tunings, each one focused on some particular scale or form of harmony or some other abstract theoretical principle. Which is precisely why I've felt the need to disown my microtonal corpus, or at least distance myself from it. Regardless of what anyone may think of it, to me it is not art. It is not an expression of my self.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:10:&amp;lt;h2&amp;gt; --&gt;&lt;h2 id="toc5"&gt;&lt;a name="Why NOT Microtonality: The Trials and Tribulations of My Xenharmonic Life-Mistake #5: Hating on 12-TET"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;!-- ws:end:WikiTextHeadingRule:10 --&gt;Mistake #5: Hating on 12-TET&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
12-TET-bashing used to be a lot more common in the community than it seems to be these days, which is an encouraging sign, but for a long time I was as vehement an anti-12 crusader as anyone. I used to decry 12-TET as being hackneyed, cliched, boring, stifling, washed-up, limiting, and superficial. That was stupid. 12-TET is an excellent tuning, and all the microtonal theory more or less agrees. For some people it may not be the &lt;em&gt;best&lt;/em&gt;, and there are probably arguments to be made that it should share some space with a few other good tunings. But for me, it really is the holy grail. It's easy to navigate because it divides into more equal parts than any other ET less than double its size--12 has factors of 2, 3, 4, and 6. The fact that it also has very acceptable 5-limit harmony and can at least imply 7- and 9-limit harmony (to say nothing of its good representations of ratios of 15, 17, and 19, which add to its harmonic versatility) is extremely remarkable, bordering on miraculous. It also supports more of the best 5-limit temperaments than its nearest competitors of 15, 19, and 22: meantone, schismatic, srutal, injera, diminished, augmented, ripple, and passion. It's incredible, truly incredible, that such a simple equal temperament could be so good.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As you can see, my study of microtonality has taken me all the way out the other side, and actually deepened my appreciation for 12-TET, rather than diminishing it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now that I'm comfortable admitting all the great things about 12-TET, it's given me a completely new perspective on microtonality. No other tuning is going to &amp;quot;beat 12-TET at its own game&amp;quot;, and if I want a tuning that does everything I like about 12-TET, then 12-TET is the only tuning worth bothering with. That's fine. For general-purpose music making, I think 12-TET does the best job at serving the greatest number of people in the greatest number of ways. Now that that's been established, it is possible to look in earnest at what alternative tunings actually have to offer that might be appealing, rather than searching hopelessly for something that's &amp;quot;better&amp;quot; than 12-TET and will spark a world-wide tuning revolution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:12:&amp;lt;h2&amp;gt; --&gt;&lt;h2 id="toc6"&gt;&lt;a name="Why NOT Microtonality: The Trials and Tribulations of My Xenharmonic Life-Mistake #6: Not Sticking With One Tuning"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;!-- ws:end:WikiTextHeadingRule:12 --&gt;Mistake #6: Not Sticking With One Tuning&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This ties in a bit with all of the previous mistakes, and is more or less a result of them. Really, I never wanted microtonality to be a vast new universe of infinite possibilities. I wanted something different, but just &lt;em&gt;one&lt;/em&gt; different thing that would fit me like a glove. Unfortunately I never found a concrete way of formalizing or quantifying what I wanted, so I never figured out what the &amp;quot;best&amp;quot; tuning for my needs would be. What I ended up doing was hopping from tuning to tuning, eventually evolving an &amp;quot;every tuning is good for something!&amp;quot; world-view that made commitment essentially impossible. What I &lt;em&gt;should&lt;/em&gt; have done is just picked one and stuck to it. I don't think it really even matters which one anymore. 31edo, 22edo, 17edo, 19edo, 16edo, 15edo, 10edo...whatever. Just sticking with one, diving deep, really internalizing its structure, naturalizing the language of its notation, becoming fluid and fluent with it, that's something I never really did. That's something very few people do in this community, and it is reflected in the quality of the music and the near-complete absence of any practice-centered music theory. I think it's possible that if I could just stick with one--just pick one, and build my life's work on it--mistakes #1-5 would cease to be problematic for me.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So I encourage anyone reading this: don't get lost in the hype over various tunings. Come up with a comfortable size-range for yourself, decide how close to JI you care to get, and pick any tuning in your size range that gets you as close as you want to JI...and stick to it! Become an expert in it, catalog its strengths and test its weaknesses, compose a huge repertoire for it, establish some conventions in it, collaborate with others on it. Mine it for everything it's worth! This, I now believe, will be vastly more rewarding over the long haul than flitting from tuning to tuning indefinitely.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:14:&amp;lt;h2&amp;gt; --&gt;&lt;h2 id="toc7"&gt;&lt;a name="Why NOT Microtonality: The Trials and Tribulations of My Xenharmonic Life-Epilogue"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;!-- ws:end:WikiTextHeadingRule:14 --&gt;Epilogue&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When I first made this page, it was a tirade against microtonality, an attempt to warn people away from it and debunk all claims made in its favor. I've since come to take a more tempered perspective on the matter (no pun intended?), though I still believe that microtonality is a tricky pursuit that will not universally serve all musicians (or even a majority of them). I no longer think of it as hopeless and foolish, but I still think it is quite shrouded in rhetoric and falsehoods. However, I think I am at last getting close to figuring out what I want from it and how to get it, as well as what I can offer the community and what I can't. But time will tell, and the jury (as of this writing) is still out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:16:&amp;lt;h1&amp;gt; --&gt;&lt;h1 id="toc8"&gt;&lt;a name="See also"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;!-- ws:end:WikiTextHeadingRule:16 --&gt;See also&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/Why%20micotonality"&gt;Why micotonality&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/Whynotnotmicrotonality"&gt;Whynotnotmicrotonality&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/body&gt;&lt;/html&gt;</pre></div>

Latest revision as of 05:02, 7 April 2025

Why NOT Microtonality: The Perils and Pitfalls of Going from "Musician" to "Microtonalist"

My name is Igliashon Jones, and I identified as a microtonalist for a solid 7 years of my life. The purpose of this article is to explain why I stopped identifying as one, and why I think more people should stop identifying themselves this way (or never start in the first place). For the purposes of this op-ed, I'm going to use the term "microtonality" to refer more to a particular disposition to alternative tunings, rather than simply the use of alternative tunings. This is important, because it is my view that it is entirely possible to use tunings other than 12-TET without using "microtonality", without making "microtonal" music, and certainly without becoming "a microtonalist".

So what is "microtonality", as I'm using the term? Simply put, microtonality is the belief that tunings (and theoretical ideas about tunings) have immense musical importance, generally above and beyond any other single aspect of music (and occasionally above and beyond all other aspects of music). That is to say, when one becomes a microtonalist and adopts the principles of microtonality, one often finds oneself engaged in composing, seeking out, listening to, and/or discussing music which, were it not in an alternative tuning, one would generally find unremarkable (if not outright detestable). For example, re-tuned MIDI files, cheesy Csound renderings, amaturish guitar plunkings, or even simply music that falls well outside of one's normal tastes. In fact, one may even become fanatically devoted to this sort of music, perhaps even losing touch with musical taste all together.

Another typical aspect of microtonality (as opposed to simply "making music with alternative tunings") is that one generally spends a majority (or even the entirety) of one's music-related time creating, discovering, and/or exploring new tunings, either in theory or in composition. A microtonalist who uses only a single alternative tuning is basically unheard of, and any person who does only use a single alternative tuning probably doesn't identify as "a microtonalist". Microtonality as a movement suffers from an intense form of attention deficit disorder, which prevents any real musical progress from being made: this ADD ensures that musical collaboration is rare and short-lived, or indeed any in-depth exploration of an alternative tuning. One only needs to spend a week on a microtonal discussion forum (such as the facebook "Xenharmonic Alliance") to see this ADD in action--rarely (if ever) can a single tuning hold the focus of any one person, let alone the whole group. This is, of course, by design--a core principle of microtonality is that there is no one "best" tuning, because different tunings are good for different things, and so everyone must be free to choose tunings at will, just as they would choose tempo, rhythm, orchestration, dynamics (etc.). Nevermind the fact that few people (if any) ever spend long enough with a tuning to actually figure out what it is and is not good for, or the fact that few (if any) can even agree on which tunings are good or bad for which musical purposes. The acceptance of the validity and utility of infinitely-many tunings is the central dogma of microtonality and is never questioned.

All of this is extremely hazardous to the musician. To enter the microtonal world, one is compelled either to bite the bullet and climb the learning curve to assimilate all the available information on all the available tunings (even if all one wants is to find a single good tuning), or else one can simply dig in to a scale library and explore as many tunings as one can without giving a thought to the theoretical considerations behind them. Neither approach tends to aid the composer in producing better music--one easily either gets lost in exhibiting the various theoretical properties of tunings, or gets lost in the tunings themselves. The fact that composing and producing microtonal music severely limits one's choices of instrumentation (due to the incompatibility of most major soft- and hardware synthesizers with alternative tunings, as well as the lack of readily-available alternative-tuning-friendly acoustic instruments) is also significant; the microtonalist often has to make do with subpar or homemade equipment, or pay a premium price for custom-constructed instruments. This last aspect is especially detrimental when combined with the ADD typical of microtonalists--it is rare that any microtonalist bothers to build or purchase multiple instruments in the same tuning.

But perhaps the worst part of being a microtonalist is the loss of healthy perspective. Oftentimes the adoption of microtonality leads one to scorn "regular" music and to treat 12-tone equal temperament with disdain. The healthiest microtonalists are those who don't subscribe to the anti-12 rhetoric, and maintain at least one foot firmly planted in the 12-tet world, continuing to play "regular" music with "regular" musicians (although, these folks are seldom prolific composers in alternative tunings). Those who choose instead to detach from the musical community at large and plunge with both feet into microtonality--which is precisely what I did--can completely lose touch with the outside world, and develop a delusional sense of the importance of the microtonal "movement" (or rather, the delusion that there is a microtonal movement at all, and that it is important). This sort of delusion can and does lead people to get all kinds of worked up over trivial matters; I was an especially potent and recent case of this, but the history of the various online tuning groups is rife with other examples.

How to Use Alternative Tunings Without Becoming a Microtonalist

This is what I'm actively researching right now, because despite my harsh words about microtonality, I do think alternative tunings (or at least, a few alternative tunings) are worthwhile to pursue and develop musically. What I have figured out so far:

1. Don't Quit 12-tet

12-tet is a great tuning, and much of the microtonal theory supports it--indeed, much of the theory arose to try to explain why and how 12-tet is as awesome as it is. For a tremendous variety of musical applications, there is simply no better tuning. It's okay to acknowledge that, and you don't have to give up your interest in alternative tunings to do so.

2. Commit and Specialize

Spend the minimum amount of time possible searching for a tuning you like, and once you find one, spend the rest of your life with it. Become the world's leading expert in it. The bulk of microtonal discussions center around discovering and categorizing tunings; once you pick one and stick to it, you will have no need or desire for those sorts of discussions. Instead, you'll be interested in figuring out how music works in your chosen tuning, and will quickly get past the theoretical exhibitionary phase and start integrating the tuning on a deeper level. If you must, pick a couple, but be warned that the more tunings you try to use, the shorter distance you will progress with any of them.

3. Understand the True (Lack of) Importance of Tuning in Composition

Tuning and intonation are subtle things, compared to rhythm, orchestration, dynamics, and lyrics (in vocal music). One can often wildly alter the intonation of a piece of music without making it unrecognizable, and in many cases alterations may even be unnoticeable to non-expert listeners. For example, diatonic music in 17edo can oftentimes be passed off as "normal", despite intonational variances of more than 30 cents from 12-tet in some intervals. In most cases, a change in timbre is more noticeable than a change in tuning, unless the change in tuning is rather extreme. It all seems to be profoundly challenging to write music that non-expert listeners will both a) recognize as being tuned unusually and b) not hear as "out-of-tune" (and this applies as much to extended JI as it does to exotemperaments). Good music is made by the skillful manipulation of all compositional parameters, not an obsessive focus on a single one. Especially considering that tuning is nothing more than a particular set of constraints on harmonic and melodic construction, and is only audible through harmony and melody.

4. Recognize That There is No "Microtonal Movement"

Movements are unified and cohesive actions undertaken by a coordinated mass of people to achieve a specific and definite set of goals. In the microtonal "community", the lone unifying principle is "not 12-tet", or more properly, "not 12-tet all of the time". There are no unified actions being undertaken, the people are not coordinate, and the set of goals is anything but specific and definite. There is no movement, just a bunch of people from a vast diversity of backgrounds whose obsession with alternative tunings has driven them together. If you feel inclined to the same messianic bent I once had, believing that someday the microtonal movement will overthrow the 12-tet hegemony and replace it with your favorite tuning or even just complete intonational freedom, you should probably seek help. Lord knows I should have.

5. Never Stop Having Fun

This is music, and music is nothing but a pleasant diversional activity to help keep us all sane and happy as our little blue-green spaceship hurtles precariously through the cosmos. Enjoy the heck out it before you do anything else with it. That goes double for the study and application of alternative tunings.

6. Be Honest With Yourself

Admit when something is not working. Admit when the tuning doesn't serve you, or when it's become too much of your focus, or when you just don't like it. Don't be too gentle with yourself, and don't get too hung up on ideology or rhetoric.

(to be continued)

See also

Why microtonality, Whynotnotmicrotonality