Talk:Dyadic chord: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikispacesArchive>Mike Battaglia
m Text replacement - "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''" to "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.''' <span style="color:#800000">''...
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WSArchiveLink}}
{{WSArchiveLink}}
== Query on mention of 36/35 -- is 36/25 meant? ==
There are references to 36/35 and 10/7 differing by 126/125, the starling comma. Could this mean 36/25, or (6/5)^2? [[User:Mschulter1325|Mschulter1325]] 07:31, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
: Yeah, 36/25 and 10/7 differ by 126/125.  I just checked in Wolfram Alpha. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 07:42, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
== Move to "dyadically consonant chord" ==
To me, "dyadic chord" most intuitively means "chord that is a dyad".

Latest revision as of 02:23, 2 April 2025

This page also contains archived Wikispaces discussion.

Query on mention of 36/35 -- is 36/25 meant?

There are references to 36/35 and 10/7 differing by 126/125, the starling comma. Could this mean 36/25, or (6/5)^2? Mschulter1325 07:31, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

Yeah, 36/25 and 10/7 differ by 126/125. I just checked in Wolfram Alpha. --Aura (talk) 07:42, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

Move to "dyadically consonant chord"

To me, "dyadic chord" most intuitively means "chord that is a dyad".