Talk:11edo: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Please check mapping of 9-limit intervals |
m typo |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
"The wiki page for 11EDO might need brushing up in regards to consistency, since it keeps referring to the "correct" 9-limit intervals, but the listed val in 3-limit cannot produce those 🤔 Because the 3rd harmonic is so flat, it would put 9/8 at 1\11 edosteps, but the page keeps referring it to 2\11." | "The wiki page for 11EDO might need brushing up in regards to consistency, since it keeps referring to the "correct" 9-limit intervals, but the listed val in 3-limit cannot produce those 🤔 Because the 3rd harmonic is so flat, it would put 9/8 at 1\11 edosteps, but the page keeps referring it to 2\11." | ||
: I don't really see the issue. Mapping 9/8 to 1\11 seems absurd, and the interval table does state that it's based on the 2.9 subgroup and not 2.3. | |||
: Maybe the confusion is because in the regular temperament properties the full 13-limit [11 17 26 31 38 41] is assumed (which is questionable for sure). | |||
: – [[User:Sintel|<span style="color:#965d99">Sintel</span>🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 22:55, 13 February 2025 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 22:55, 13 February 2025
|
This page also contains archived Wikispaces discussion. |
Please check mapping of 9-limit intervals
Someone private messaged me on Facebook because I'm a wiki editor, but I didn't feel confident dealing with the thing they talked about so I'm posting it here so someone more confident and experienced can deal with it:
"The wiki page for 11EDO might need brushing up in regards to consistency, since it keeps referring to the "correct" 9-limit intervals, but the listed val in 3-limit cannot produce those 🤔 Because the 3rd harmonic is so flat, it would put 9/8 at 1\11 edosteps, but the page keeps referring it to 2\11."
- I don't really see the issue. Mapping 9/8 to 1\11 seems absurd, and the interval table does state that it's based on the 2.9 subgroup and not 2.3.
- Maybe the confusion is because in the regular temperament properties the full 13-limit [11 17 26 31 38 41] is assumed (which is questionable for sure).
- – Sintel🎏 (talk) 22:55, 13 February 2025 (UTC)