Talk:64/63: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Aura (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:
Instead of saying "On the other hand, if one should be so bold as to treat the Archytas' comma as a musical interval in its own right", it would be better to reorganize this article after the example of the [[128/125|Diesis]], which has an Approximations section, and following that a Temperaments section which has sub-sections for "As a comma" and "As an interval" (and while we're at it, can we get it a non-comma name?).  After all, NOT tempering out the Archytas comma is a requirement for many septimal temperaments to work properly, where tempering it out results in a d (or even dd) val, although in equal divisions of the octave smaller than 44EDO, it will unavoidably be inflated.
Instead of saying "On the other hand, if one should be so bold as to treat the Archytas' comma as a musical interval in its own right", it would be better to reorganize this article after the example of the [[128/125|Diesis]], which has an Approximations section, and following that a Temperaments section which has sub-sections for "As a comma" and "As an interval" (and while we're at it, can we get it a non-comma name?).  After all, NOT tempering out the Archytas comma is a requirement for many septimal temperaments to work properly, where tempering it out results in a d (or even dd) val, although in equal divisions of the octave smaller than 44EDO, it will unavoidably be inflated.
[[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 19:06, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
[[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 19:06, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
: I think I'd have to say that 64/63 could be called either the "Archytas Superprime" or the "Archytas Narrow Inframinor Second" depending on whether it functions as a prime or a second. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 20:28, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:28, 30 July 2024

Naming

Hey, Xenwolf, I don't know about you, but "Archytas' comma" strikes me as a unique name. It's true that I'd prefer 64/63 as title for this article, but still... --Aura (talk) 15:48, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

For German people "Leipziger Komma" would be the easiest name to remember and pronounce. But in a mathematical of functional sense all the names are just noise. 😉 --Xenwolf (talk) 16:17, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Organization, and the Archytas comma as a musical interval in its own right

Instead of saying "On the other hand, if one should be so bold as to treat the Archytas' comma as a musical interval in its own right", it would be better to reorganize this article after the example of the Diesis, which has an Approximations section, and following that a Temperaments section which has sub-sections for "As a comma" and "As an interval" (and while we're at it, can we get it a non-comma name?). After all, NOT tempering out the Archytas comma is a requirement for many septimal temperaments to work properly, where tempering it out results in a d (or even dd) val, although in equal divisions of the octave smaller than 44EDO, it will unavoidably be inflated. Lucius Chiaraviglio (talk) 19:06, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

I think I'd have to say that 64/63 could be called either the "Archytas Superprime" or the "Archytas Narrow Inframinor Second" depending on whether it functions as a prime or a second. --Aura (talk) 20:28, 30 July 2024 (UTC)