Talk:20th-octave temperaments: Difference between revisions
re |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:: I think an easy compromise would be to write compound temperament names as hyphenated compound words: in this case, "soviet-ferris-wheel". [[User:Fredg999|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999|talk]]) 02:42, 19 September 2023 (UTC) | :: I think an easy compromise would be to write compound temperament names as hyphenated compound words: in this case, "soviet-ferris-wheel". [[User:Fredg999|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999|talk]]) 02:42, 19 September 2023 (UTC) | ||
::: That is a good alternative and I'm for it. [[User:Eliora|Eliora]] ([[User talk:Eliora|talk]]) 11:31, 19 September 2023 (UTC) | ::: That is a good alternative and I'm for it. [[User:Eliora|Eliora]] ([[User talk:Eliora|talk]]) 11:31, 19 September 2023 (UTC) | ||
:::: The hyphenated version makes more sense if it's used as an adjective rather than standalone. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 12:03, 19 September 2023 (UTC) | :::: The hyphenated version makes more sense if it's used as an adjective rather than standalone. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 12:03, 19 September 2023 (UTC) | ||
::::: One could argue that "Soviet-Ferris-wheel" (I forgot the capital letters in my previous suggestion) stands implicitly for "Soviet-Ferris-wheel temperament". If we're being pedantic, that could mean "Soviet Ferris wheel" and "Soviet-Ferris-wheel temperament" could coexist, but I would also easily accept using only the hyphenated form for the aforementioned reason. [[User:Fredg999|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999|talk]]) 22:55, 19 September 2023 (UTC) | |||