User talk:Ganaram inukshuk/TAMEX
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This proposed naming convention seems fairly logical and frugal in new terminology.
My only gripe is parseability. I recently needed accidentals for soft jaric (10L 2s). To call these "soft jaric accidentals" runs the risk of parsing the name as "soft accidentals of 2L 8s" which of course is non-sensical, but I would still recommend adding a dash in the names for better grouping i.e. "soft-jaric accidentals".
There's no ambiguity in calling 34edo a "soft soft-jaric" while "soft soft jaric" doesn't look right to my eyes. --Frostburn (talk) 13:43, 28 December 2023 (UTC)