Talk:The Biosphere/WikispacesArchive

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW

All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.
Please do not add any new discussion to this archive page.
All new discussion should go on Talk:The Biosphere.


Porcupinefish

Removed an error--the listed mapping did not temper out 91/90 and had a much higher badness figure anyway; replaced it with a version derived from the listed commas.

- genewardsmith October 22, 2011, 01:53:50 PM UTC-0700


Should we can this?

I made this a long time ago to try and do to 91/90 what the Biosphere did to 676/675. My initial approach was to treat the 91/90-tempered 2.3.7.13/5 rank-3 lattice in the same way that we treat the untempered rank-3 2.3.5 lattice, in that the base chords would be 6:7:9 and 10:13:15, both of which are very manageable complexity. I was hoping we'd then see a lot of subtemperaments derived from this, just like there's plenty deriving from 2.3.5, but until I code up the tuning library I've been talking about on the tuning list I don't have a way to search subgroups like that.

I still think that 91/90 is an award-winning comma, because it turns 6:7:9 into the utonal inverse of 10:13:15, but this page never took off. Most of these temperaments are just 2.3.7.13/5 subgroup versions of things we know. Should we just can it?

- mbattaglia1 September 18, 2011, 06:38:26 PM UTC-0700