Talk:Microtonal music/WikispacesArchive

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW

All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.
Please do not add any new discussion to this archive page.
All new discussion should go on Talk:Microtonal music.


Redundancy

I see an increasing amount of redundancy in the xenwiki. The content of this page, e.g., overlaps a good deal with the page "what is microtonal music".

I would like to suggest, once more, the principle "DRY".

- hstraub August 17, 2011, 12:46:30 AM UTC-0700


Wikipedia has both a microtonal music article and a xenharmonic music article. How's that for redundency. Anyway, I need to rescue the article from the clutches of Wikipedia.

- genewardsmith August 17, 2011, 12:57:43 AM UTC-0700


This is not Wikipedia. So it is absolutely not relevant how redundant WIkipedia is.

I still do not see the point in having overlapping stuff (e.g. concerning terminology) on different pages.

- hstraub August 17, 2011, 01:43:33 AM UTC-0700


It's a wiki, that's why there isn't a global concept for distributing information. Redundancy is not so bad as long as it remains within limits.

I think, The "DRY" principle wasn't designed for wikis - to just put this pointedly:

Wikis as communication platforms can hardly be more redundancy-free, as communication itself.

- xenwolf August 17, 2011, 02:28:06 AM UTC-0700


@hstraub:

...oh I forgot: you are fully right:

Yes, thank God, this is not Wikipedia! :)

- xenwolf August 17, 2011, 02:30:16 AM UTC-0700


I don't give a d**n what DRY was originally designed for. This wiki has reached a size where keeping track of all the stuff in it is getting increasingly difficult. IMO, "DRY" is becoming more and more a sheer necessity.

And I still do not see what is the point of having two sections on two different pages dedicated to the various terms that are used instead of or additinally to "microtonal".

- hstraub August 17, 2011, 03:41:42 AM UTC-0700


Nobody hinders you the remove duplicated sections and build a new page from it.

One-pagers for external use can be made with the page inclusion facility that is available in the wikispaces software. try

include page="PAGENAME"

- xenwolf August 17, 2011, 03:55:24 AM UTC-0700


But then Gene might have to rescue his article from some clutches again.

But i guess I will do so (at the risk of being called a drooling, slobbering moron, too).

- hstraub August 17, 2011, 04:13:34 AM UTC-0700


Since the Xenwiki is not written from a single point of view, I don't see how you can enforce a single source of truth. It makes sense to do so with definitions, but why with articles on topics like microtonality?

- genewardsmith August 17, 2011, 08:58:49 AM UTC-0700


Your section on terminology apparently has already the claim of covering the existing multiple points of view, mentioning the terms microtonal, micro-intervals, macro-interval, ultra-chromatic, infra-chromatic, xenharmonic.

There is a section on another page with obviously the same aim, mentioning the terms microtonal, macrotonal, also xenharmonic (with about the same definition as in your article), neoteric, non-western, alternative tuning, metachromatic, ekmelic.

What's wrong with combining these two articles into one that lists all the terms? What's wrong with that?

- hstraub August 17, 2011, 11:43:51 AM UTC-0700


Alright, alright - I will leave your article as it is and jus tput a link to it on http://xenharmonic.wikispaces.com/DefineMicrotonal .

But I will fix some if the links.

- hstraub August 17, 2011, 11:32:12 PM UTC-0700