From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search


All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.
Please do not add any new discussion to this archive page.
All new discussion should go on Talk:MicrotonalTheory.

EDO theory links to EDO pages?

Since each EDO now has its own page, maybe the EDO theory links here should be moved there?

Besides, I am, once more, asking myself what the distinction between "Theory" and "Scales" is...

- hstraub May 29, 2007, 01:11:32 PM UTC-0700

I moved the EDO theory links to the repective EDO pages - and also the otonal 17 link.

I think we could organize each EDO page into 3 paragraphs: theory - scales - compositions. 17edo is already like that.

Still wondering about what to do with the "scales" page...

- hstraub June 01, 2007, 01:46:12 PM UTC-0700

nixed the links

I'm hoping this becomes a place especially for building new structures of information and knowledge and pedagogy within the domain of microtonal theory, and I don't see the need right now for a list of external links without any guide as to how to peruse those links.

- xenjacob February 15, 2007, 07:47:41 PM UTC-0800

Just a list of links without any guide does indeed not make that much sense. Yet I think links *with* guide ought to be there, since there is quite some amount of microtonal theory on the web that I consider relevant. I would say that Monz's encyclopedia on tuning terms should be there at least. And maybe Paul Erlich's paper on 22-tone theory, parallel to the 17-tone theory on this wiki?

- hstraub March 25, 2007, 10:51:28 AM UTC-0700

yes. I think if we could have a guide to monz's encyclopedia, like groups of topics, e.g. "read these articles in this order to better understand x", i think that could be great. now, to do it...

- xenjacob March 25, 2007, 10:55:46 AM UTC-0700