ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW
Please do not add any new discussion to this archive page.
All new discussion should go on Talk:MicrotonalTheory.
Since each EDO now has its own page, maybe the EDO theory links here should be moved there?
Besides, I am, once more, asking myself what the distinction between "Theory" and "Scales" is...
- hstraub May 29, 2007, 01:11:32 PM UTC-0700
I moved the EDO theory links to the repective EDO pages - and also the otonal 17 link.
I think we could organize each EDO page into 3 paragraphs: theory - scales - compositions. 17edo is already like that.
Still wondering about what to do with the "scales" page...
- hstraub June 01, 2007, 01:46:12 PM UTC-0700
I'm hoping this becomes a place especially for building new structures of information and knowledge and pedagogy within the domain of microtonal theory, and I don't see the need right now for a list of external links without any guide as to how to peruse those links.
- xenjacob February 15, 2007, 07:47:41 PM UTC-0800
Just a list of links without any guide does indeed not make that much sense. Yet I think links *with* guide ought to be there, since there is quite some amount of microtonal theory on the web that I consider relevant. I would say that Monz's encyclopedia on tuning terms should be there at least. And maybe Paul Erlich's paper on 22-tone theory, parallel to the 17-tone theory on this wiki?
- hstraub March 25, 2007, 10:51:28 AM UTC-0700
yes. I think if we could have a guide to monz's encyclopedia, like groups of topics, e.g. "read these articles in this order to better understand x", i think that could be great. now, to do it...
- xenjacob March 25, 2007, 10:55:46 AM UTC-0700