Talk:Maximal evenness/WikispacesArchive

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW

All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.
Please do not add any new discussion to this archive page.
All new discussion should go on Talk:Maximal evenness.


more general definition

I added the slightly wrong example of the major scale in 12edo, according to the given definition, it should be the Locrian mode.

What about the more general formula

floor((i*edo+disp)/steps)

with i and disp in the range [0,steps-1] ?

- xenwolf January 10, 2014, 01:23:16 AM UTC-0800


what is quasi-equal?

I've noticed that folks tend to use the phrase "quasi-equal" in a less strict sense than "maximally even". This might be a good way to go, and I wonder how people feel about it. We could use QE to describe:

1. Scales that are "close" to equal, leaving "close" subjective and context-sensitive.

2. Scales where L:s is within a specific range.

In my MOS investigations page, I noted a few different ranges of L:s and the consequences this has on chromatic alterations of the scale. In particular, there is:

Case A: L/s<2. The chroma is smaller than the s step (c<s).

Case B: L/s=2, ie. L=2s. The chroma and the small step are the same (c=s).

Case C: L/s>2. The chroma is larger than the s step (c>s).

Case A1: 2<L/s<3/2. The diminished step (s-c) is smaller than the chroma (d<c).

Case A2: L/s=3/2. The diminished step and the chroma are the same (d=c).

Case A3: 3/2<L/s<1. The diminished step is larger than the chroma (d>c).

So I wonder if we want to reserve the term "quasi-equal" for Case A3, where 3/2<L/s<1. Is this a useful range to have a name for, and does it make sense to use this name for that?

Another possibility is that QE could also include Case A2, where L/s = 3/2. What say ye?

- Andrew_Heathwaite June 20, 2012, 07:46:18 AM UTC-0700


As I understand Mandelbaum's definition, it just says two intervals of adjacent size - I.e. L-s=1, nothing else.

For "maximally even", there is an additional condition: that the intervals are distributed as evenly as possible. This means that, e.g., the melodic minor scale in 12edo is quasi-equal but not maximally even.

- hstraub December 25, 2013, 08:56:08 AM UTC-0800


Maximal Evenness

These are exactly the same thing as maximally even scales, right?

- keenanpepper November 26, 2011, 02:03:45 PM UTC-0800


Hm, looking now at the Wikipedia page for "Maximally Even," I think that is the case. I initially got the concept and phrase from Joel Mandelbaum's dissertation on 19-one equal temperament (which I think I read on the web, but I can't see to find now). I wasn't aware there was another phrase for this property.

- Andrew_Heathwaite November 26, 2011, 07:01:11 PM UTC-0800


That sounds as if the claim in Wikipedia that Clough and Douthett were the first with the idea is false.

- genewardsmith November 26, 2011, 07:04:31 PM UTC-0800


I would very much love to hear that Mandelbaum preceded Clough and Douthett with maximal evenness. Is that true?

- mbattaglia1 November 26, 2011, 09:04:16 PM UTC-0800


I am absolutely not making that claim! As far as I know, Mandelbaum only preceded Clough and Douthett in my own experience. I'll be the first to tell you that there's a lot I don't know about. As I said above, I'm pretty sure I found Mandelbaum's dissertation on the web somewhere, and if you can find it that might clear up the confusion a bit. I'm not attached to the phrase "quasi-equal," it's just the only one I knew about. If "maximal evenness" is more standard, it's no problem for me to start using it.

- Andrew_Heathwaite November 27, 2011, 07:44:48 AM UTC-0800


Ok, here it is -- from 1961.

http://www.anaphoria.com/mandelbaum.html

- Andrew_Heathwaite November 27, 2011, 07:46:34 AM UTC-0800


Hmm, in which chapter of Mandelbaum's dissertation did you see the definition analogous to maximal evenness?

- hstraub December 25, 2013, 02:55:07 AM UTC-0800


Chapter 14, page 4-5.

- Andrew_Heathwaite December 25, 2013, 07:40:28 AM UTC-0800


"The systems considered here will all have in common that they are based on scales containing intervals as equal as is possible within a 19-tone system. ...as the diatonic scale in 12-tone equal temperament is composed only of the intervals 1/12 and 2/12 ... so all of the scales to be considered here contain a range of two intervals of adjacent size; the size of the intervals will depend on the number of tones in the scale. This is what is meant by the term 'quasi-equal' in the title of this supplement."

- Andrew_Heathwaite December 25, 2013, 07:44:20 AM UTC-0800


Thanks. Indeed, what Mandelbaum calls "quasi-equal-interval-symmetrical" (QEIS) is, as far as I can see, exactly the same as maximally even. Quasi-equal alone is a little less.

- hstraub December 25, 2013, 08:38:26 AM UTC-0800


Ah yes. Looking more closely at the text, I see that you are correct. Thanks for the clarification!

- Andrew_Heathwaite December 25, 2013, 10:50:59 AM UTC-0800