Talk:Catalog of thirteen-limit rank two temperaments/WikispacesArchive
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW
All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.
Please do not add any new discussion to this archive page. All new discussion should go on Talk:Catalog of thirteen-limit rank two temperaments.
Please do not add any new discussion to this archive page. All new discussion should go on Talk:Catalog of thirteen-limit rank two temperaments.
reproducing badness?
Unlike on Catalog of eleven-limit rank two temperaments, I can't reproduce the badness figures from the errors and complexities here, whether or not I divide the stated error by 1200 first.
- clumma November 12, 2013, 01:57:52 PM UTC-0800
Echidnic
Why is echidnic not on here?
- Kosmorsky March 09, 2012, 03:18:33 PM UTC-0800
It didn't make the cut. It has TE badness times 1000 of 28.874, and the cutoff was 25.
- genewardsmith March 09, 2012, 05:14:45 PM UTC-0800
Ooohhhh noooo! It's because of that blasted eleven isn't it. About how many other quality temperament might there be in between the "best" and "worst"?
- Kosmorsky March 09, 2012, 06:05:35 PM UTC-0800