Height

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The height is a tool to measure the dissonance of JI intervals.

Definition

A height is a function on members of an algebraically defined object which maps elements to real numbers, yielding a type of complexity measurement. For example we can assign each element of the positive rational numbers a height, and hence a complexity. While there is no consensus on the restrictions of a height, we will attempt to create a definition for positive rational numbers which is practical for musical purposes.

A height function H(q) on the positive rationals q should fulfill the following criteria:

  1. Given any constant C, there are finitely many elements q such that H(q) ≤ C.
  2. H(q) is bounded below by H(1), so that H(q) ≥ H(1) for all q.
  3. H(q) = H(1) iff q = 1.
  4. H(q) = H(1/q)
  5. H(q^n) ≥ H(q) for any non-negative integer n

If we have a function F(x) which is strictly increasing on the positive reals, then F(H(q)) will rank elements in the same order as H(q). We can therefore establish the following equivalence relation:

[math]H \left( {q} \right) \equiv F \left( {H} \left( {q} \right) \right)[/math]

A semi-height is a function which does not obey criterion #3 above, so that there is a rational number q ≠ 1 such that H(q) = H(1), resulting in an equivalence relation on its elements, under which #1 is modified to a finite number of equivalence classes. An example would be octave equivalence, where two ratios p and q are considered equivalent if the following is true:

[math]2^{-v_2 \left( {p} \right)} p = 2^{-v_2 \left( {q} \right)} q[/math]

Or equivalently, if n has any integer solutions:

[math]p = 2^n q[/math]

If the above condition is met, we may then establish the following equivalence relation:

[math]p \equiv q[/math]

By changing the base of the exponent to a value other than 2, you can set up completely different equivalence relations. Replacing the 2 with a 3 yields tritave-equivalence, for example.

Examples of Height Functions

Name Type H(n/d) H(q) H(q) simplified by equivalence relation
Benedetti height
(or Tenney height)
Height [math]n d[/math] [math]2^{\large{\|q\|_{T1}}}[/math] [math]\|q\|_{T1}[/math]
Wilson height Height [math]\text{sopfr}(n d)[/math] [math]2^{\large{\text{sopfr}(n d)}}[/math] [math]\text{sopfr}(q)[/math]
Weil height Height [math]\max \left( {n , d} \right)[/math] [math]2^{\large{\frac{1}{2}(\|q\|_{T1} + \mid \log_2(\mid q \mid)\mid)}}[/math] [math]\|q\|_{T1} + \mid \log_2(\mid q \mid)\mid[/math]
Arithmetic height Height [math]n + d[/math] [math]\dfrac {\left( {q + 1} \right)} {\sqrt{q}} 2^{\large{\frac{1}{2} {\|q\|_{T1}}}}[/math] [math]\|q\|_{T1} + 2 \log_2 \left( {q + 1} \right) - \log_2 \left( {q} \right)[/math]
Harmonic semi-height Semi-Height [math]\dfrac {n d} {n + d}[/math] [math]\dfrac {\sqrt{q}} {\left( {q + 1} \right)} 2^{\large{\frac{1}{2} {\|q\|_{T1}}}}[/math] [math]\|q\|_{T1} - 2 \log_2 \left( {q + 1} \right) + \log_2 \left( {q} \right)[/math]
Kees semi-height Semi-Height [math]\max \left( {2^{-v_2 \left( {n} \right)} n, 2^{-v_2 \left( {d} \right)} d} \right)[/math] [math]2^{\large{\left(\frac{1}{2}\left(\|2^{-v_2 \left( {q} \right)} q\|_{T1} + \mid \log_2(q) - v_2(q) \mid \right)\right)}}[/math] [math]\|{2^{-v_2 \left( {q} \right)} q}\|_{T1} + | \log_2 \left( {q} \right) - v_2 \left( {q} \right) |[/math]

Where ||q||T1 is the tenney norm of q in monzo form, and vp(x) is the p-adic valuation of x.

The function [math]\text{sopfr}(nd)[/math] is the "sum of prime factors with repeition" of n*d. Equivalently, this is the L1 norm on monzos, but where each prime is weighted by "p" rather than "log(p)". This is called "Wilson's Complexity" in John Chalmers's "Divisions of the Tetrachord."[1]

Some useful identities:

  • [math]n = 2^{\large{\frac{1}{2}(\|q\|_{T1} + \log_2(q))}}[/math]
  • [math]d = 2^{\large{\frac{1}{2}(\|q\|_{T1} - \log_2(q))}}[/math]
  • [math]n d = 2^{\|q\|_{T1}}[/math]

Height functions can also be put on the points of projective varieties. Since abstract regular temperaments can be identified with rational points on Grassmann varieties, complexity measures of regular temperaments are also height functions.

History

The concept of height was introduced to xenharmonics by Gene Ward Smith in 2001[2]; it comes from the mathematical field of number theory (for more information, see height function). It is not to be confused with the musical notion of pitch height (as opposed to pitch chroma)[3].

See also

References

  1. See http://lumma.org/tuning/chalmers/DivisionsOfTheTetrachord.pdf, page 55
  2. https://yahootuninggroupsultimatebackup.github.io/tuning/topicId_31418#31488
  3. Though it has also been used to refer to the size of an interval in cents. On page 23 of https://www.plainsound.org/pdfs/JC&ToH.pdf, Tenney writes: "The one-dimensional continuum of pitch-height (i.e. 'pitch' as ordinarily defined)", and graphs it as opposed to his concept of "harmonic distance", which was ironically the first measurement named by Gene Ward Smith as a "height": "Tenney height".