Talk:1ed44c
Merge request
When considering whether this is identical enough to 16edf to merge, I compared the harmonic approximations of both:
| Harmonic | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Error | Absolute (¢) | -12.0 | -10.0 | +20.0 | -14.3 | -22.0 | +19.2 | +8.0 | -19.9 | +17.7 | -15.3 | +10.0 | +3.5 | +7.2 | +19.7 | -4.0 | -21.0 | +12.1 | +6.5 |
| Relative (%) | -27.3 | -22.6 | +45.5 | -32.5 | -49.9 | +43.6 | +18.2 | -45.3 | +40.2 | -34.8 | +22.8 | +7.9 | +16.3 | +44.8 | -9.1 | -47.6 | +27.5 | +14.7 | |
| Step | 27 | 43 | 55 | 63 | 70 | 77 | 82 | 86 | 91 | 94 | 98 | 101 | 104 | 107 | 109 | 111 | 114 | 116 | |
| Harmonic | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Error | Absolute (¢) | -15.5 | -15.5 | +13.0 | +21.5 | +13.0 | +9.3 | -2.5 | +13.0 | +6.1 | +16.5 | -2.5 | -9.4 | -6.1 | +6.1 | -17.9 | +8.7 | -2.5 | -8.3 |
| Relative (%) | -35.2 | -35.2 | +29.6 | +49.0 | +29.6 | +21.3 | -5.7 | +29.6 | +13.8 | +37.7 | -5.7 | -21.5 | -13.9 | +13.8 | -40.9 | +19.9 | -5.7 | -19.0 | |
| Steps (reduced) |
27 (11) |
43 (11) |
55 (7) |
64 (0) |
71 (7) |
77 (13) |
82 (2) |
87 (7) |
91 (11) |
95 (15) |
98 (2) |
101 (5) |
104 (8) |
107 (11) |
109 (13) |
112 (0) |
114 (2) |
116 (4) | |
The mappings of 5, 6, 9, 11 and 17 are different.
1ed44c has a meaningfully better 2, 3, 5, 13 and 16.
16edf has a meaningfully better 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 15, 17 and 18.
They are very similar, whether they should be merged or not, I'm not sure, but if they are merged, these differences should be mentioned in the text.
--BudjarnLambeth (talk) 23:23, 1 August 2025 (UTC)