Xenwolf (talk | contribs)
Line 10: Line 10:


:: Thanks for the clarification, now I see what you mean. I think we should by all means avoid the [[Wikipedia:Specials (Unicode block)|Unicode special character]] which is reserved to indicate an encoding error. Using <code>0</code> is much better, even if not ideal (superscript notation is unexpectedly switching from mathematical to linguistic meaning). But you are right, coping with zeros is definitely a weakness of the [[monzo notation]]. <br> BTW: didn't you mean <code>[1590 0<sup>12</sup> 293⟩</code> (alias <code style="white-space:nowrap">[1590 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 293⟩</code>) instead? --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 21:39, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
:: Thanks for the clarification, now I see what you mean. I think we should by all means avoid the [[Wikipedia:Specials (Unicode block)|Unicode special character]] which is reserved to indicate an encoding error. Using <code>0</code> is much better, even if not ideal (superscript notation is unexpectedly switching from mathematical to linguistic meaning). But you are right, coping with zeros is definitely a weakness of the [[monzo notation]]. <br> BTW: didn't you mean <code>[1590 0<sup>12</sup> 293⟩</code> (alias <code style="white-space:nowrap">[1590 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 293⟩</code>) instead? --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 21:39, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
== You can ask me for the RTT table instead of trying it yourself ==
… if you're interested in such a thing before having a thorough understanding of what each part is about. It's important that these tables are correct, consistent, and conforming to a standard in order to be of some utility. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 11:29, 4 March 2022 (UTC)