Talk:Octave reduction: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Xenwolf (talk | contribs)
m (put merge issue in its own section)
Xenwolf (talk | contribs)
Line 7: Line 7:
== Introduction ==
== Introduction ==


I don't think to start with a generalized view. I'm especially confused by the [https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=Octave_reduction&type=revision&diff=74592&oldid=74275 change done by Fredg999]. @Fredg999, as a teacher, you should know that by starting this way, you'll losing half of your students. Would you please be so kind as to change the order to (1) octave reduction (2) generalization? Thanks. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 11:02, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
I don't think that it's a good idea to start from the ''generalized perspective''. I'm especially confused by the fact that [https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=Octave_reduction&type=revision&diff=74592&oldid=74275 the change] was done by Fredg999. @Fredg999, , as a teacher, you should know that if you introduce a topic in this way, you risk losing the attention of half the students already at the beginning. Would you please be so kind as to change the order to (1) octave reduction (2) generalization? Thanks. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 11:29, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:29, 18 July 2021

Merge

Should merge this page with Octave-reduce -- Spt3125 (talk) 19:09, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

Done meanwhile. --Xenwolf (talk) 11:03, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Introduction

I don't think that it's a good idea to start from the generalized perspective. I'm especially confused by the fact that the change was done by Fredg999. @Fredg999, , as a teacher, you should know that if you introduce a topic in this way, you risk losing the attention of half the students already at the beginning. Would you please be so kind as to change the order to (1) octave reduction (2) generalization? Thanks. --Xenwolf (talk) 11:29, 18 July 2021 (UTC)