Xenharmonic Wiki talk:License: Difference between revisions
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
I suspect that NC was chosen just because of the general inclination that this work isn't intended for commercial use. I suspect nobody considered the compatibility issue or other ramifications of the license. Is that right? | I suspect that NC was chosen just because of the general inclination that this work isn't intended for commercial use. I suspect nobody considered the compatibility issue or other ramifications of the license. Is that right? | ||
=== Possible changes to allow CC-BY-SA === | |||
I think it would be worth the effort to build the consensus needed to change to the standard CC-BY-SA. | I think it would be worth the effort to build the consensus needed to change to the standard CC-BY-SA. | ||
Maybe a practical way to transition is possible. Consider a case where everyone contacted accepts a change to CC-BY-SA. Then, any substantial material from those who could not be reached could be specifically marked with an indication that the specific page is NC licensed still. I hope this will not be needed. Overall, it would be a huge improvement to be compatible with the rest of the wiki world and not segregate this material. | |||
--[[User:Wolftune|Wolftune]] ([[User talk:Wolftune|talk]]) 05:12, 22 March 2021 (UTC) | --[[User:Wolftune|Wolftune]] ([[User talk:Wolftune|talk]]) 05:12, 22 March 2021 (UTC) | ||