Xenharmonic Wiki talk:Things to do: Difference between revisions
→Set a semi-objective standard for classifying edos as subgroup temperaments: Reply to Godtone's proposal |
|||
| Line 378: | Line 378: | ||
: @Godtone your proposal looks like a measure of absolute error very similar to [[TE error]] (weighted RMS error of primes). I suggest you check that if you have not. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 11:54, 22 January 2021 (UTC) | : @Godtone your proposal looks like a measure of absolute error very similar to [[TE error]] (weighted RMS error of primes). I suggest you check that if you have not. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 11:54, 22 January 2021 (UTC) | ||
: I don't think it's our place as wiki editors to pass judgement on what an edo can do. Our job is just to report the facts. But any rating or metric will have some arbitrariness. We have the absolute and relative errors of each prime right there at the top of the edo's page. This lets people make their own decisions. Not to say that what you're doing isn't a worthwhile endeavor. I just don't think it belongs on the edo pages. Perhaps it could be a separate page on the xenwiki called "Godtone's analysis of EDO subgroups" or some such, that the main EDO page links to. --[[User:TallKite|TallKite]] ([[User talk:TallKite|talk]]) 07:59, 24 January 2021 (UTC) | |||