Rperlner
Joined 26 October 2020
→Scherzo in 26 EDO: new section |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Thanks! Yeah, Everyone I've talked to seems to like the 48-EDO version better. I also have a 26 edo version I like quite a lot, which I'll get around to uploading eventually. Pleased to meet you. -- Rperlner | Thanks! Yeah, Everyone I've talked to seems to like the 48-EDO version better. I also have a 26 edo version I like quite a lot, which I'll get around to uploading eventually. Pleased to meet you. -- Rperlner | ||
== Scherzo in 26 EDO == | |||
Hi Ray, <br> | |||
your Scherzo in [[26edo|26 EDO]] sounds good. The notation looks quite uncommon to readers of classic music, but interesting. After a bit of calculation I found out that the accidentals actually cause a 1\26 shift. Notating the piece in "B" causes that no double-flats have to be used (also F# and C# would allow this). I think we should have at least one article about circle-of-fifths notation(s). Thanks for sharing. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 13:24, 14 November 2020 (UTC) <br> | |||
<small>PS: the sixfold ''forte'' in the 3rd-last bar before ''Fine'' seems like a glitch to me. </small> | |||