Xenharmonic Wiki talk:Things to do: Difference between revisions

← Older edit Newer edit →

VisualWikitext

@@ Line 41: / Line 41: @@
 *: [Xenwolf: no need, consider other templates for other EDs]
-* step <code>size</code>
+* <code>step size</code>
+*: [Xenwolf: size alone isn't clear]
 * commas tempered out
@@ Line 62: / Line 63: @@
 Thoughts? --[[User:Arseniiv|Arseniiv]] ([[User talk:Arseniiv|talk]]) 14:44, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
-: The parameters <code>step count</code> (or <code>steps</code>) and <code>size</code> seem indisputable to me, EDO implies 2/1 as <code>period</code> (I'd consider to make other templates for other EDs). What about prime factorization? Relates would be great for navigational purposes (for instance predecessor and successor). As far as the parameters can be filled without headaches and without edit wars they should be included. Maybe we can get a community process started about that. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 18:31, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
+: The parameters <code>step count</code> (or <code>step size</code>) and <code>size</code> seem indisputable to me, EDO implies 2/1 as <code>period</code> (I'd consider to make other templates for other EDs). What about prime factorization? Relates would be great for navigational purposes (for instance predecessor and successor). As far as the parameters can be filled without headaches and without edit wars they should be included. Maybe we can get a community process started about that. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 18:31, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
 :: Do you mean prime factorization for <code>steps</code>? --[[User:Arseniiv|Arseniiv]] ([[User talk:Arseniiv|talk]]) 19:39, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
+:: Writing only <code>size</code> was a mistake: I corrected that in may comment and in the "working copy" on top. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 20:42, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
 : I'm afraid <code>Commas tempered out</code> and <code>Commas not tempered out</code> are too many stuff. And there's no consensus what constitutes "notable". [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 18:47, 7 November 2020 (UTC)