Xenharmonic Wiki talk:Things to do: Difference between revisions
m →Add to the navbar: certainly |
→Template:Stub: new section |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
:::: 🤝 | :::: 🤝 | ||
:::: BTW would be nice to make something to enter a couple of frequent emoji from somewhere near post edit. Does MediaWiki has a toolbar or something for this case?.. --[[User:Arseniiv|Arseniiv]] ([[User talk:Arseniiv|talk]]) 22:05, 5 November 2020 (UTC) | :::: BTW would be nice to make something to enter a couple of frequent emoji from somewhere near post edit. Does MediaWiki has a toolbar or something for this case?.. --[[User:Arseniiv|Arseniiv]] ([[User talk:Arseniiv|talk]]) 22:05, 5 November 2020 (UTC) | ||
== <code>Template:Stub</code> == | |||
I hope that would be found useful to automatically categorize pages as needing attention (maybe even different kinds of attention?), as well as marking the places needing elaboration. For example, right on this page until it’s “production ready” ;-) I’ll investigate later if I’m up to the task to desigh a nice-looking template but if you know how to do it easily, please feel free to! --[[User:Arseniiv|Arseniiv]] ([[User talk:Arseniiv|talk]]) 17:43, 5 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
: Before thinking about an appropriate [[Template:Stub]], I think [[:Category:Todo]] is worth a look, as well as its sub categories, these category developed out of wikispaces tags and are maybe more specific then just ''stub''. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 18:24, 5 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
:: Oh, this is a treasure! But a visual rectangular reminder may still be useful? Let it be tunable to include the subcategory of Todo one wants to apply. How do you think? I’ll experiment with that in a subspace. --[[User:Arseniiv|Arseniiv]] ([[User talk:Arseniiv|talk]]) 18:53, 5 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
::: The template with an example of how it looks: [[User:Arseniiv/TodoTest]]. It seems to apply the category correctly. Maybe that can find some use still, but if not, no problem. --[[User:Arseniiv|Arseniiv]] ([[User talk:Arseniiv|talk]]) 19:51, 5 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
:::: I moved this discussion from [[Xenharmonic Wiki:Things to do]] to here, since it's not decided yet whether it should go into the list. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 12:42, 7 November 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:42, 7 November 2020
Automatic color names?
Has somebody mused about generating suitable humane color names for intervals and other things? For example, for an interval, one needs to know whether to name it a third, a fourth, a sixth, but AFAIU they are often scale-dependent, and the same interval can have a “(color 1) third” name and a “(color 2) fourth” name. What can be done obviously is to enumerate the most sensible of potential cases (like if the interval is between 5/4 and 4/3, likely it will function more often as a third or fourth and less often as a second or fifth), but one needs to be able to tell for example if 7/5 may called a fourth, or there’s a sense it should be called a fifth way more often than a fourth. I’d try to write some code to guess appropriate color names, but having advice beforehand would be very nice. --Arseniiv (talk) 18:08, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- Oops, I hadn’t read the description well enough! The matter is way simpler and there is no guessing at all. --Arseniiv (talk) 20:10, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
It would be also worth it to add this page to the navigation close to Help and Conventions, even if later. --Arseniiv (talk) 21:09, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- We'll do that soon. But I think that we should first have to clarify its structure. I'd prefer dedicated pages one per task (maybe as sub pages). We should have a handful of clearly defined projects available before we link this overview in the navigation. The style of the existing ones will silently work as a blueprint for future projects, so we better limit confusion to a minimum. a bit of styling (for the intro in the header) could also help to make this site as inviting as possible. --Xenwolf (talk) 21:40, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
Template:Stub
I hope that would be found useful to automatically categorize pages as needing attention (maybe even different kinds of attention?), as well as marking the places needing elaboration. For example, right on this page until it’s “production ready” ;-) I’ll investigate later if I’m up to the task to desigh a nice-looking template but if you know how to do it easily, please feel free to! --Arseniiv (talk) 17:43, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- Before thinking about an appropriate Template:Stub, I think Category:Todo is worth a look, as well as its sub categories, these category developed out of wikispaces tags and are maybe more specific then just stub. --Xenwolf (talk) 18:24, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- The template with an example of how it looks: User:Arseniiv/TodoTest. It seems to apply the category correctly. Maybe that can find some use still, but if not, no problem. --Arseniiv (talk) 19:51, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- I moved this discussion from Xenharmonic Wiki:Things to do to here, since it's not decided yet whether it should go into the list. --Xenwolf (talk) 12:42, 7 November 2020 (UTC)