Xenharmonic Wiki

Talk:5/3: Difference between revisions

← Older editNewer edit →
VisualWikitext
Mike Battaglia (talk | contribs)
autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, confirmaccount-notify, emailconfirmed, Interface administrators, Sysops
1,399 edits
m Text replacement - "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''" to "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.''' <span style="color:#800000">''...
WikispacesArchive>Mike Battaglia
m Text replacement - "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''" to "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.''' <span style="color:#800000">''...
Line 1: Line 1:
= ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =
{{WSArchiveLink}}
'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''
 
<span style="color:#800000">'''PLEASE MAKE ANY NEW COMMENTS <u>ABOVE</u> THIS SECTION.'''</span> Anything below here is for archival purposes only.
 
----
 
== A slightly narrow major sixth? ==
I think this is an absurd characterization. Shall we also call 3/2 a very slightly wide perfect fifth?
 
- '''genewardsmith''' September 29, 2011, 03:51:10 PM UTC-0700
----
I am not attached to that characterization.  "Narrow" is a relative term.  I was thinking of the two major sixths that appear in the 5-limit, the other being 26/16.  5/3 is clearly the narrower.  However, just to call it narrow without reference to anything is kind of silly, if not absurd as you say.  So I'll go ahead and change it.
 
- '''Andrew_Heathwaite''' September 29, 2011, 03:59:12 PM UTC-0700
----
Retrieved from "https://en.xen.wiki/w/Talk:5/3"
Return to "5/3" page.