Talk:3L 4s: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Tuning ranges incomplete?: new section |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Is there any particular reason the "tuning ranges" ("ultrasoft", "quasisoft" etc.) don't completely cover the range? Like where does a 351 cent generator fall? —[[User:Keenan Pepper|Keenan Pepper]] ([[User talk:Keenan Pepper|talk]]) 22:18, 19 April 2021 (UTC) | Is there any particular reason the "tuning ranges" ("ultrasoft", "quasisoft" etc.) don't completely cover the range? Like where does a 351 cent generator fall? —[[User:Keenan Pepper|Keenan Pepper]] ([[User talk:Keenan Pepper|talk]]) 22:18, 19 April 2021 (UTC) | ||
: It seems to only cover ranges that are "notable". A 351 cent generator would fall in the parasoft range. This range likely isn't covered because the fifth isn't good for meantone or archy. This range includes optimal [[Rastmic clan#Neutral|neutral]] tunings, but the simplest good extension of it is [[hemififths]], which doesn't even contain simple intervals of 5 and 7 in the 3L 4s MOS, so whether it should be included or not is debateable. --[[User:Overthink|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink|talk]]) 22:11, 24 October 2025 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:11, 24 October 2025
Tuning ranges incomplete?
Is there any particular reason the "tuning ranges" ("ultrasoft", "quasisoft" etc.) don't completely cover the range? Like where does a 351 cent generator fall? —Keenan Pepper (talk) 22:18, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
- It seems to only cover ranges that are "notable". A 351 cent generator would fall in the parasoft range. This range likely isn't covered because the fifth isn't good for meantone or archy. This range includes optimal neutral tunings, but the simplest good extension of it is hemififths, which doesn't even contain simple intervals of 5 and 7 in the 3L 4s MOS, so whether it should be included or not is debateable. --Overthink (talk) 22:11, 24 October 2025 (UTC)