12edo: Difference between revisions
clarify what the 12edo thirds are being compared to. We are a wiki, not a 31edo propaganda channel |
m →Theory |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
It is the smallest number of equal divisions of the octave ([[edo]]) which can seriously claim to represent [[5-limit]] harmony, and because it represents a [[meantone]] temperament (specifically {{frac|1|12}} Pythagorean comma meantone, or approximately {{frac|1|11}} syntonic comma or full schisma meantone). | It is the smallest number of equal divisions of the octave ([[edo]]) which can seriously claim to represent [[5-limit]] harmony, and because it represents a [[meantone]] temperament (specifically {{frac|1|12}} Pythagorean comma meantone, or approximately {{frac|1|11}} syntonic comma or full schisma meantone). | ||
It divides the octave into twelve equal parts, each of exactly 100 [[cent]]s each unless [[stretched and compressed tuning|octave stretching or compression]] is employed. It has a [[3/2|fifth]] which is quite accurate at 700 cents, two cents flat of just. It has a [[5/4|major third]] which is 13.7 cents sharp of | It divides the octave into twelve equal parts, each of exactly 100 [[cent]]s each unless [[stretched and compressed tuning|octave stretching or compression]] is employed. It has a [[3/2|fifth]] which is quite accurate at 700 cents, two cents flat of just. It has a [[5/4|major third]] which is 13.7 cents sharp of just, which, while reasonable for its size, is unsatisfactory for some. The [[6/5|minor third]] is flat of just by even more, 15.6 cents. | ||
Historically, 12edo became dominant primarily due to practical considerations for keyboard instruments and its ability to handle modulation across all keys with reasonable intonation. | Historically, 12edo became dominant primarily due to practical considerations for keyboard instruments and its ability to handle modulation across all keys with reasonable intonation. |