User:BudjarnLambeth/Draft related tunings section: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
BudjarnLambeth (talk | contribs)
Created page with "This is a draft of what a standard "related tunings" section might look like on edo pages, using 36edo as an example. Todo: * Choose a more sensible set of tunings (eg remove zpis and ed255/128-type things and ads n-limit WE, n-limit TE type things) * Make the mapping info take up less horizontal space * Add a column for amount of stretch (maybe as a %?) {{Editable user page}} == Related equal tunings == What follows is a comparison of stretched- and compressed-octave..."
 
BudjarnLambeth (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
* Make the mapping info take up less horizontal space
* Make the mapping info take up less horizontal space
* Add a column for amount of stretch (maybe as a %?)
* Add a column for amount of stretch (maybe as a %?)
* Change error columns to use absolute error (in cents) rather than relative error (%)


{{Editable user page}}
{{Editable user page}}

Revision as of 06:17, 17 August 2025

This is a draft of what a standard "related tunings" section might look like on edo pages, using 36edo as an example.

Todo:

  • Choose a more sensible set of tunings (eg remove zpis and ed255/128-type things and ads n-limit WE, n-limit TE type things)
  • Make the mapping info take up less horizontal space
  • Add a column for amount of stretch (maybe as a %?)
  • Change error columns to use absolute error (in cents) rather than relative error (%)
This user page is editable by any wiki editor.

As a general rule, most users expect their user space to be edited only by themselves, except for minor edits (e.g. maintenance), undoing obviously harmful edits such as vandalism or disruptive editing, and user talk pages.

However, by including this message box, the author of this user page has indicated that this page is open to contributions from other users (e.g. content-related edits).

Related equal tunings

What follows is a comparison of stretched- and compressed-octave 36edo tunings.

Of the stretched-octave tunings listed, 36ed513/256, with a step size about 33.4 cents, performs best in this comparison, approximating all 11-limit primes with less than 36% relative error (< 12 cents error).

Of the compressed-octave tunings listed, 36ed511/256, with a step size about 33.25 cents, performs best in this comparison, approximating all 11-limit primes with less than 36% relative error (< 12 cents error).

The edonoi scales of 57edt and 101ed7 are almost exactly the same as 36edo. They are 36edo with the octave stretched by less than 1 ¢. Their main usage is to optimise 36edo for use as a dual-5 tuning, while also making slight improvements to 3/1 and 7/1 as well. So if one intends to use both 36edo's vals for 5/1 at once, 57edt or 101ed7 may be worth considering.

Tuning Step size
(cents)
Error (% step size) Mapping (# steps)
Prime 2 Prime 3 Prime 5 Prime 7 Prime 11 Prime 2 Prime 3 Prime 5 Prime 7 Prime 11
154zpi 33.547 +23 +31 -5 -41 +27 36 57 83 100 124
36ed257/128 33.521 +20 +26 -12 +50 +15 36 57 83 101 124
36ed513/256 33.427 +10 +11 -35 +23 -18 36 57 83 101 124
57edt 33.368 +4 0 +50 +5 -40 36 57 83 101 124
101ed7 33.355 +2 -2 +46 0 -46 36 57 84 101 124
155zpi 33.350 +2 -3 +45 -1 -48 36 57 84 101 124
36edo 33.333 0 -6 +40 -6 +46 36 57 84 101 125
36ed511/256 33.239 -10 -22 +18 -35 +11 36 57 84 101 125
156zpi 33.152 -20 -37 -5 +38 -23 36 57 84 102 125
36ed255/128 33.145 -21 -38 -6 +36 -25 36 57 84 102 125