User talk:Grady/Harmonic similarity: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Tritaves and Fifths versus Octaves and Unisons: new section |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Tritaves and Fifths versus Octaves and Unisons == | == Tritaves and Fifths versus Octaves and Unisons == | ||
I saw what you wrote in about tritaves working better as equivalences than fifths, but my thought is that such a phenomenon mainly holds true for the same reason that perfect unisons and octaves differ- of course, it should go without saying that we can't divide the perfect unison into smaller segments, because two notes "separated" by a perfect unison are exactly identical. Any thoughts on this idea? --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 17:48, 6 August 2025 (UTC) | I saw what you wrote in about tritaves working better as equivalences than fifths, but my thought is that such a phenomenon mainly holds true for the same reason that perfect unisons and perfect octaves differ- of course, it should go without saying that we can't divide the perfect unison into smaller segments, because two notes "separated" by a perfect unison are exactly identical. Any thoughts on this idea? --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 17:48, 6 August 2025 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 17:49, 6 August 2025
Tritaves and Fifths versus Octaves and Unisons
I saw what you wrote in about tritaves working better as equivalences than fifths, but my thought is that such a phenomenon mainly holds true for the same reason that perfect unisons and perfect octaves differ- of course, it should go without saying that we can't divide the perfect unison into smaller segments, because two notes "separated" by a perfect unison are exactly identical. Any thoughts on this idea? --Aura (talk) 17:48, 6 August 2025 (UTC)