User talk:Sintel: Difference between revisions

Line 19:

: – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 08:18, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

:: So could the term be repurposed for something more useful? [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 10:02, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

:: So could the term be repurposed for something more useful (like scales with negative or blown-out steps)? [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 10:04, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:02, 16 April 2025 view source Lucius Chiaraviglio (talk \| contribs) 2,587 edits →Pathological scales: Repurpose term? ← Older edit		Revision as of 10:04, 16 April 2025 view source Lucius Chiaraviglio (talk \| contribs) 2,587 edits (Make the question more specific) Newer edit →
Line 19:		Line 19:
	: – [[User:Sintel\|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel\|talk]]) 08:18, 16 April 2025 (UTC)		: – [[User:Sintel\|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel\|talk]]) 08:18, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

	:: So could the term be repurposed for something more useful? [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|talk]]) 10:02, 16 April 2025 (UTC)		:: So could the term be repurposed for something more useful (like scales with negative or blown-out steps)? [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|talk]]) 10:04, 16 April 2025 (UTC)