Talk:Constant structure: Difference between revisions
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Interval matrix as note names: | Interval matrix as note names: | ||
| Line 94: | Line 93: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
This usage seems incoherent to me: if the scale in the example is the diatonic scale containing C, D, E, F, G, A, and B, then | This usage seems incoherent to me: if the scale in the example is the diatonic scale containing C, D, E, F, G, A, and B, then ''the scale in question doesn't contain any notes with sharps or flats,'' and it's nonsensical to talk about those notes. Instead, the table should describe the notes from a single scale, and the paragraph that follows it should also refer to the notes within that same scale. | ||
I suggest something like the following instead: | I suggest something like the following instead: | ||
| Line 353: | Line 352: | ||
| 31\31 | | 31\31 | ||
|} | |} | ||
---- | |||
--[[User:Bcmills|Bcmills]] ([[User talk:Bcmills|talk]]) 12:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC) | --[[User:Bcmills|Bcmills]] ([[User talk:Bcmills|talk]]) 12:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC) | ||