MOS substitution: Difference between revisions

Inthar (talk | contribs)
Inthar (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''MOS substitution''' is a procedure for obtaining a ternary scale with arbitrary scale signature aLbmcs. Originally developed by Inthar for the purpose of adding aberrisma steps in an orderly manner to a MOS pattern in the context of groundfault's aberrismic theory, MOS substitution is intended to take advantage of extra symmetry when a, c or b, c is not a coprime pair and generalize the congruence substitution procedure for building balanced words to obtain non-balanced but still more "even" scales.
'''MOS substitution''' is a procedure for obtaining a ternary scale with arbitrary scale signature aLbmcs. Originally developed by Inthar for the purpose of adding aberrisma steps in an orderly manner to a MOS pattern in the context of groundfault's aberrismic theory, MOS substitution is intended to take advantage of extra symmetry when a, c or b, c is not a coprime pair and generalize the congruence substitution procedure for building balanced words to obtain non-balanced but still more "even" scales.


Take for example d = (a, c) (:= gcd(a, c)), let a' = a/d and c' = c/d. Consider the MOS word (a + c)Xbm, which we call the ''template MOS''. The most even arrangement of a'-many L steps and c'-many s steps is the MOS a'Lc's, so this method prescribes following the latter MOS, called the ''filling MOS'', to fill in the X's. Fixing a choice of which X in (a + c)Xbm you start from, you have to choose a mode of a'Lc's. (Todo: count the distinct choices.) If a' = c' = 1, we obtain a balanced (equivalently MV3) scale; when in addition b is odd, the scale is also SV3 and chiral, and we recover the two chiralities from the two modes of a'Lc's. Of course, one may do this using aL(b + c)X and (b/(b, c))m (c/(b, c))s instead.
Take for example d = (a, c) (:= gcd(a, c)), let a' = a/d and c' = c/d. Consider the MOS word (a + c)Xbm, which we call the ''template MOS''. The most even arrangement of a'-many L steps and c'-many s steps is the MOS a'Lc's, so this method prescribes following the latter MOS, called the ''filling MOS'', to fill in the X's. Fixing a choice of which X in (a + c)Xbm you start from, you have to choose a mode of a'Lc's. (Todo: count the distinct choices.) If a' = c' = 1, we obtain a balanced (equivalently MV3) ternary scale; when in addition b is odd, the scale is also SV3 and chiral, and we recover the two chiralities from the two modes of a'Lc's. Of course, one may do this using aL(b + c)X and (b/(b, c))m (c/(b, c))s instead.


For 5L2m4s, we obtain LsLsLmLsLsm, LsLmLsLsLms, and LmLsLsLmLss. The first two are a chiral pair of billiard scales, and the last is achiral but not deletion-MOS. All three scales admit short generator sequences of 2-steps, respectively GS(L+s, L+s, L+m), GS(L+s, L+m, L+s), and GS(L+m, L+s, L+s), notably representing all 3 possible rotations of (L+s, L+m, L+s).
For 5L2m4s, we obtain LsLsLmLsLsm, LsLmLsLsLms, and LmLsLsLmLss. The first two are a chiral pair of billiard scales, and the last is achiral but not deletion-MOS. All three scales admit short generator sequences of 2-steps, respectively GS(L+s, L+s, L+m), GS(L+s, L+m, L+s), and GS(L+m, L+s, L+s), notably representing all 3 possible rotations of (L+s, L+m, L+s).