Talk:Dual-fifth temperaments: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ask about the nature of 3⁻ in A-team. |
CompactStar (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Is the second comma for A-team the correct way around? When I solve 3⁻ from the vanishing of [-8 1 4 0⟩ I get 3⁻ = 2⁸/3⁺⁴ ~ 256/81 ~ 3.1605. I would've expected 3⁻ to be the smaller three if the other is left untempered. --[[User:Frostburn|Frostburn]] ([[User talk:Frostburn|talk]]) 07:24, 17 January 2024 (UTC) | Is the second comma for A-team the correct way around? When I solve 3⁻ from the vanishing of [-8 1 4 0⟩ I get 3⁻ = 2⁸/3⁺⁴ ~ 256/81 ~ 3.1605. I would've expected 3⁻ to be the smaller three if the other is left untempered. --[[User:Frostburn|Frostburn]] ([[User talk:Frostburn|talk]]) 07:24, 17 January 2024 (UTC) | ||
For the question about Travesty, yes (if you were to treat it as truly dual-fifth). [[User:CompactStar|CompactStar]] ([[User talk:CompactStar|talk]]) | |||
Revision as of 07:26, 17 January 2024
Travesty
I presume the subgroup 2.3.5.97 means that 3 is mapped to 3⁻, and 97/32 is mapped to 3⁺? --Akselai (talk) 20:38, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Is the second comma for A-team the correct way around? When I solve 3⁻ from the vanishing of [-8 1 4 0⟩ I get 3⁻ = 2⁸/3⁺⁴ ~ 256/81 ~ 3.1605. I would've expected 3⁻ to be the smaller three if the other is left untempered. --Frostburn (talk) 07:24, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
For the question about Travesty, yes (if you were to treat it as truly dual-fifth). CompactStar (talk)