Talk:Frequency temperament: Difference between revisions
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
: That's a fair point. To me, the comparison to temperaments seems tenuous here; this has nothing to do with commas and mappings, the linear algebra foundations of regular temperaments. It seems only to do with generators and possibly periods, which are another theoretical component that appears in RTT. I understand that the page was already updated somewhat to improve upon this issue. A single "arithmetic interval chain", i.e. with a single generator, to me seems identical to an [[AFS]] (arithmetic frequency sequence), and any ideas you feel are present on this new page that you feel are missing from that page should be merged in. Otherwise, if your original idea is intended to be extending this idea to ''multiple'' generators, then it seems less like a single chain and more like a "lattice" or something like that. And as for "arithmetic MOS", I believe on the discussion page for that, I suggested "frequency MOS" as a more appropriate name. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 23:55, 31 March 2023 (UTC) | : That's a fair point. To me, the comparison to temperaments seems tenuous here; this has nothing to do with commas and mappings, the linear algebra foundations of regular temperaments. It seems only to do with generators and possibly periods, which are another theoretical component that appears in RTT. I understand that the page was already updated somewhat to improve upon this issue. A single "arithmetic interval chain", i.e. with a single generator, to me seems identical to an [[AFS]] (arithmetic frequency sequence), and any ideas you feel are present on this new page that you feel are missing from that page should be merged in. Otherwise, if your original idea is intended to be extending this idea to ''multiple'' generators, then it seems less like a single chain and more like a "lattice" or something like that. And as for "arithmetic MOS", I believe on the discussion page for that, I suggested "frequency MOS" as a more appropriate name. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 23:55, 31 March 2023 (UTC) | ||
: Per recent discussion the [[Talk:IFDO]] page, "arithmetic" does not mean "with respect to frequency", and so what this page is really describing is a "frequency interval chain", which is identical to an "arithmetic frequency sequence", or [[AFS]], which already has a page. Alternatively, if you do some additional work on this page to extend your idea to systems with multiple generators, then there is a case that you have a "frequency lattice" or something like that, and you should change the name of the page to whatever you like along those lines. But I don't see how this page can be left as it is; the problem is more severe than merely terminological here. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 21:42, 14 April 2023 (UTC) | |||