Talk:Frequency temperament: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
CompactStar (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
CompactStar (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
I suggest that since this way of using "arithmetic" is contentious, this page (along with [[Arithmetic MOS scale]]) should be withdrawn from the main wiki and changed to user pages. See [[ADO#History]] for more information. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 18:35, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
I suggest that since this way of using "arithmetic" is contentious, this page (along with [[Arithmetic MOS scale]]) should be withdrawn from the main wiki and changed to user pages. See [[ADO#History]] for more information. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 18:35, 30 March 2023 (UTC)


I do not believe we should move the ADO article and related articles to the usespace solely on the basis of terminology. If you are suggesting that the "arithmetic" and "inverse-arithmetic" names should be dropped, it is sufficient to move "ADO" to "ODO" or whatever other alternative name is preferred, "arithmetic interval chain" to "otonal interval chain", "IDO" to "UDO", and so on.
I do not believe we should move the ADO article and related articles to the usespace solely on the basis of terminology. If you are suggesting that the "arithmetic" and "inverse-arithmetic" names should be dropped due to being controversial, it is sufficient to move "ADO" to "ODO" or whatever other alternative name is preferred, "arithmetic interval chain" to "otonal interval chain", "IDO" to "UDO", and so on.
[[User:CompactStar|CompactStar]] ([[User talk:CompactStar|talk]]) 02:08, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
[[User:CompactStar|CompactStar]] ([[User talk:CompactStar|talk]]) 02:08, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:15, 31 March 2023

Suggestion to withdraw to user page

I suggest that since this way of using "arithmetic" is contentious, this page (along with Arithmetic MOS scale) should be withdrawn from the main wiki and changed to user pages. See ADO#History for more information. --Cmloegcmluin (talk) 18:35, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

I do not believe we should move the ADO article and related articles to the usespace solely on the basis of terminology. If you are suggesting that the "arithmetic" and "inverse-arithmetic" names should be dropped due to being controversial, it is sufficient to move "ADO" to "ODO" or whatever other alternative name is preferred, "arithmetic interval chain" to "otonal interval chain", "IDO" to "UDO", and so on. CompactStar (talk) 02:08, 31 March 2023 (UTC)