Height: Difference between revisions

m Style; internalize wikipedia links; improve readability (WP:EASTER)
Line 5: Line 5:
== Definition ==
== Definition ==


A '''height''' is a function on members of an algebraically defined object which maps elements to real numbers, yielding a type of complexity measurement. (See [[Wikipedia:Height function]].For example we can assign each element of the positive rational numbers a height, and hence a complexity. While there is no consensus on the restrictions of a height, we will attempt to create a definition for positive rational numbers which is practical for musical purposes.
A '''height''' is a function on members of an algebraically defined object which maps elements to real numbers, yielding a type of complexity measurement (see [[Wikipedia: Height function]]). For example we can assign each element of the positive rational numbers a height, and hence a complexity. While there is no consensus on the restrictions of a height, we will attempt to create a definition for positive rational numbers which is practical for musical purposes.


A height function H(q) on the positive rationals q should fulfill the following criteria:
A height function H(''q'') on the positive rationals ''q'' should fulfill the following criteria:


<ol><li>Given any constant C, there are finitely many elements q such that H(q) ≤ C.</li><li>H(q) is bounded below by H(1), so that H(q) ≥ H(1) for all q.</li><li>H(q) = H(1) iff q = 1.</li><li>H(q) = H(1/q)</li><li>H(q^n) ≥ H(q) for any non-negative integer n</li></ol>
# Given any constant ''C'', there are finitely many elements ''q'' such that H(''q'') ≤ ''C''.
# H(''q'') is bounded below by H(1), so that H(''q'') ≥ H(1) for all q.
# H(''q'') = H(1) iff ''q'' = 1.
# H(''q'') = H(1/''q'')
# H(''q''<sup>''n''</sup>) ≥ H(''q'') for any non-negative integer ''n''.


If we have a function F(x) which is strictly increasing on the positive reals, then F(H(q)) will rank elements in the same order as H(q). We can therefore establish the following equivalence relation:
If we have a function F(''x'') which is strictly increasing on the positive reals, then F(H(''q'')) will rank elements in the same order as H(''q''). We can therefore establish the following equivalence relation:


<math>H \left( {q} \right) \equiv F \left( {H} \left( {q} \right) \right)</math>
<math>\displaystyle H \left( {q} \right) \equiv F \left( {H} \left( {q} \right) \right)</math>


A '''semi-height''' is a function which does not obey criterion #3 above, so that there is a rational number q ≠ 1 such that H(q) = H(1), resulting in an equivalence relation on its elements, under which #1 is modified to a finite number of equivalence classes. An example would be [[octave equivalence]], where two ratios p and q are considered equivalent if the following is true:
A '''semi-height''' is a function which does not obey criterion #3 above, so that there is a rational number ''q'' ≠ 1 such that H(''q'') = H(1), resulting in an equivalence relation on its elements, under which #1 is modified to a finite number of equivalence classes. An example would be [[octave equivalence]], where two ratios ''p'' and ''q'' are considered equivalent if the following is true:


<math>2^{-v_2 \left( {p} \right)} p = 2^{-v_2 \left( {q} \right)} q</math>
<math>\displaystyle 2^{-v_2 \left( {p} \right)} p = 2^{-v_2 \left( {q} \right)} q</math>


Or equivalently, if n has any integer solutions:
Or equivalently, if ''n'' has any integer solutions:


<math>p = 2^n q</math>
<math>\displaystyle p = 2^n q</math>


If the above condition is met, we may then establish the following equivalence relation:
If the above condition is met, we may then establish the following equivalence relation:


<math>p \equiv q</math>
<math>\displaystyle p \equiv q</math>


By changing the base of the exponent to a value other than 2, you can set up completely different equivalence relations. Replacing the 2 with a 3 yields tritave-equivalence, for example.
By changing the base of the exponent to a value other than 2, you can set up completely different equivalence relations. Replacing the 2 with a 3 yields tritave-equivalence, for example.
Line 34: Line 38:
! Name
! Name
! Type
! Type
! H(n/d)
! H(''n''/''d'')
! H(q)
! H(''q'')
! H(q) simplified by equivalence relation
! H(''q'') simplified by equivalence relation
|-
|-
| [[Benedetti height]] <br> (or [[Tenney height]])
| [[Benedetti height]] <br> (or [[Tenney height]])
Line 75: Line 79:
|}
|}


Where ||q||<span style="font-size: 80%; vertical-align: sub;">T1</span> is the [[Generalized_Tenney_Norms_and_Tp_Interval_Space#The Tenney Norm (T1 norm)|tenney norm]] of q in monzo form, and v<span style="vertical-align: sub;">p</span>(x) is the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-adic_order p-adic valuation] of x.
Where ||''q''||<sub>T1</sub> is the [[Generalized Tenney norms and Tp interval space #The Tenney Norm (T1 norm)|tenney norm]] of ''q'' in monzo form, and v<sub>''p''</sub>(''x'') is the [[Wikipedia: P-adic order|''p''-adic valuation]] of x.


The function <math>\text{sopfr}(nd)</math> is the [https://mathworld.wolfram.com/SumofPrimeFactors.html "sum of prime factors with repetition"] of n*d. Equivalently, this is the L1 norm on monzos, but where each prime is weighted by "p" rather than "log(p)". This is called "Wilson's Complexity" in [[John Chalmers]]'s "Divisions of the Tetrachord."<ref>See http://lumma.org/tuning/chalmers/DivisionsOfTheTetrachord.pdf, page 55</ref>
The function sopfr (''nd'') is the [https://mathworld.wolfram.com/SumofPrimeFactors.html "sum of prime factors with repetition"] of ''n''·''d''. Equivalently, this is the L<sub>1</sub> norm on monzos, but where each prime is weighted by ''p'' rather than log (''p''). This is called "Wilson's Complexity" in [[John Chalmers]]'s ''Divisions of the Tetrachord''<ref>[http://lumma.org/tuning/chalmers/DivisionsOfTheTetrachord.pdf ''Division of the Tetrachord''], page 55. John Chalmers. </ref>.


Some useful identities:
Some useful identities:
Line 84: Line 88:
* <math>n d = 2^{\|q\|_{T1}}</math>
* <math>n d = 2^{\|q\|_{T1}}</math>


Height functions can also be put on the points of [http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/QuasiProjectiveVariety.html projective varieties]. Since [[abstract regular temperament]]s can be identified with rational points on [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grassmannian Grassmann varieties], complexity measures of regular temperaments are also height functions.
Height functions can also be put on the points of [http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/QuasiProjectiveVariety.html projective varieties]. Since [[abstract regular temperament]]s can be identified with rational points on [[Wikipedia: Grassmannian|Grassmann varieties]], complexity measures of regular temperaments are also height functions.


== History ==
== History ==


The concept of height was introduced to xenharmonics by [[Gene Ward Smith]] in 2001<ref>https://yahootuninggroupsultimatebackup.github.io/tuning/topicId_31418#31488</ref>; it comes from the mathematical field of number theory (for more information, see [[Wikipedia:Height_function|height function]]). It is not to be confused with the musical notion of [[Wikipedia:Pitch_(music)#Theories_of_pitch_perception|''pitch height'' (as opposed to ''pitch chroma'')]]<ref>Though it has also been used to refer to the size of an interval in cents. On page 23 of https://www.plainsound.org/pdfs/JC&ToH.pdf, Tenney writes: "The one-dimensional continuum of pitch-height (i.e. 'pitch' as ordinarily defined)", and graphs it ''as opposed to'' his concept of "harmonic distance", which was ironically the first measurement named by Gene Ward Smith as a "height": "Tenney height".</ref>.
The concept of height was introduced to xenharmonics by [[Gene Ward Smith]] in 2001<ref>[https://yahootuninggroupsultimatebackup.github.io/tuning/topicId_31418#31488 Yahoo! Tuning Group | ''Super Particular Stepsize'']</ref>; it comes from the mathematical field of number theory (for more information, see [[Wikipedia: Height function]]). It is not to be confused with the musical notion of [[Wikipedia: Pitch (music) #Theories of pitch perception|''pitch height'' (as opposed to ''pitch chroma'')]]<ref>Though it has also been used to refer to the size of an interval in cents. On page 23 of [https://www.plainsound.org/pdfs/JC&ToH.pdf ''John Cage and the Theor of Harmony''], Tenney writes: "The one-dimensional continuum of pitch-height (i.e. 'pitch' as ordinarily defined)", and graphs it ''as opposed to'' his concept of "harmonic distance", which was ironically the first measurement named by Gene Ward Smith as a "height": "Tenney height".</ref>.


== See also ==
== See also ==