Extended bra–ket notation: Difference between revisions
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) m use new templates, minor tweaks |
Dave Keenan (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 145: | Line 145: | ||
For examples, while the PC-vector representing 5/4 would be written {{vector|-2 0 1}}, the mapped version of this in meantone could be written {{rket|-2 4}}. And while the tuning map for quarter-comma meantone might be written {{map|1200.000 1896.578 2786.314}}, the generator tuning map could be written {{rbra|1200.000 696.578}}. | For examples, while the PC-vector representing 5/4 would be written {{vector|-2 0 1}}, the mapped version of this in meantone could be written {{rket|-2 4}}. And while the tuning map for quarter-comma meantone might be written {{map|1200.000 1896.578 2786.314}}, the generator tuning map could be written {{rbra|1200.000 696.578}}. | ||
We considered using a round bracket for this, [...), however in teaching this subject it is often desirable to include parenthesized expressions as entries in the bra or ket, which would be very difficult to read. A mnemonic is that the curly bracket resembles the tilde (~) which is commonly used to mark approximated or tempered intervals, e.g. ~3/2 is an approximation of 3/2. | |||
Furthermore, the use of the normal angle bracket could be restricted to matrix widths and heights equal only to the [[dimensionality]] of the temperament, <math>d</math>, and any other width or height besides <math>d</math> and <math>r</math> would be given with plain square brackets. So, for example, a comma basis could be written [{{vector|4 -4 1}} {{vector|7 0 -3}}]. | Furthermore, the use of the normal angle bracket could be restricted to matrix widths and heights equal only to the [[dimensionality]] of the temperament, <math>d</math>, and any other width or height besides <math>d</math> and <math>r</math> would be given with plain square brackets. So, for example, a comma basis could be written [{{vector|4 -4 1}} {{vector|7 0 -3}}]. | ||