Convex scale: Difference between revisions

Fredg999 category edits (talk | contribs)
BudjarnLambeth (talk | contribs)
m I noticed the article had a todo:clarify tag in the article, but it wasn't in the todo:clarify category. So I added it to the todo:clarify category.
Line 5: Line 5:
{{todo|clarify|comment=Is there maybe somebody who can explain this in plain English?|increase applicability|inline=1}}
{{todo|clarify|comment=Is there maybe somebody who can explain this in plain English?|increase applicability|inline=1}}


A simple, easy-to-understand definition of a "convex set" in a lattice is the intersection of the lattice with any [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convex_set convex region] of continuous space. See below for a more formal definition.
A simple, easy-to-understand definition of a "convex set" in a lattice is the intersection of the lattice with any [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convex_set convex region] of continuous space. See below for a more formal definition.


The '''convex hull''' or '''convex closure''' of a scale is the smallest convex scale that contains it. See [[Gallery of Z-polygon transversals]] for many scales that are the convex closures of interesting sets of pitches.
The '''convex hull''' or '''convex closure''' of a scale is the smallest convex scale that contains it. See [[Gallery of Z-polygon transversals]] for many scales that are the convex closures of interesting sets of pitches.


==Formal definition==
==Formal definition==
The following definitions make sense in the context of any Z-[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Module_%28mathematics%29 module], which is the same concept as an [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abelian_group abelian group].
The following definitions make sense in the context of any Z-[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Module_%28mathematics%29 module], which is the same concept as an [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abelian_group abelian group].


===Convex combination===
===Convex combination===
Line 17: Line 17:
<math>$(c_1 + c_2 + \dots + c_k) b = c_1 a_1 + c_2 a_2 + \dots + c_k a_k$</math>
<math>$(c_1 + c_2 + \dots + c_k) b = c_1 a_1 + c_2 a_2 + \dots + c_k a_k$</math>


Note that in this definition, a1, a2.. and b are elements of the Z-module, and c1, c2... are integers, so the only operations used are those defined for every Z-module. An equivalent definition can be given in terms of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Injective_hull injective hull] of the Z-module, which extends n-tuples of integers to n-tuples of rational numbers (a vector space over the rational numbers Q) and allows for the c_i to be rational numbers. By dividing through by  
Note that in this definition, a1, a2.. and b are elements of the Z-module, and c1, c2... are integers, so the only operations used are those defined for every Z-module. An equivalent definition can be given in terms of the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Injective_hull injective hull] of the Z-module, which extends n-tuples of integers to n-tuples of rational numbers (a vector space over the rational numbers Q) and allows for the c_i to be rational numbers. By dividing through by  


<math>$c = c_1 + c_2 + \dots + c_k$</math>
<math>$c = c_1 + c_2 + \dots + c_k$</math>
Line 40: Line 40:
[[Category:Scale]]
[[Category:Scale]]
[[Category:Math]]
[[Category:Math]]
[[Category:Todo:clarify]]